History
  • No items yet
midpage
759 F. Supp. 2d 822
E.D. La.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • MDL involves Chinese-manufactured drywall in homes; insurers move to dismiss/limit coverage under homeowners' policies.
  • Plaintiffs claim drywall causes physical loss and property damage via corrosion and odors; insurers dispute coverage under exclusions.
  • Court applies Louisiana contract interpretation and all-risk policy framework, with policy language interpreted in light of the whole policy.
  • Policies are Louisiana-sited and all-risk, placing burden on insured to show coverage and burden on insurer to prove exclusions.
  • Court considers do Doerr-style pollution/contamination exclusions, latent defect exclusions, and ensuing loss provisions under Doerr and related Louisiana authorities.
  • Decision resolves ten insurer motions by ruling on covered losses, exclusions, and whether ensuing losses or other losses are recoverable under the policies.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Chinese drywall causes a covered direct physical loss to homes Plaintiffs allege physical loss via odor and corrosion enabling loss of use Insurers contend loss is not physical loss or is excluded Yes, covered direct physical loss exists under several policies
Do latent defect exclusions bar coverage for drywall damage Latent defect exclusion should not apply to drywall Latent defect exclusion should bar coverage Latent defect exclusion does not apply
Whether pollution/contamination exclusions apply to drywall-related damage Exclusions do not apply to drywall as non-environmental pollutant Exclusion should bar coverage for contaminants/pollutants Pollution/contamination exclusions do not apply
Whether ensuing loss provisions resurrect coverage for excluded damages Ensuing losses cover damage caused by drywall No ensuing losses alleged or covered No ensuing losses; claims for covered ensuing losses rejected
Whether faulty materials exclusions apply to drywall Drywall still serves its intended purpose; exclusion should not apply Drywall constitutes faulty materials; exclusion applies Drywall constitutes faulty materials; exclusion applies

Key Cases Cited

  • Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 916 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1990) (physical loss narrowly defined; distinguishes initial unsatisfactory state)
  • Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So.2d 119 (La. 2000) (pollution/contamination exclusions construed for environmental pollution; set analytical framework)
  • Central Louisiana Elec. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 579 So.2d 981 (La. 1991) (corrosion exclusion guiding interpretation under Louisiana law)
  • Dawson Farms, LLC v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 794 So.2d 949 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2001) (enforcing ensuing loss concepts in Louisiana appellate law)
  • Alton Ochsner Med. Found. v. Allendale Mut. Ins. Co., 219 F.3d 501 (5th Cir. 2000) (enforcing ensuing loss framework; exclusions vs. ensuing coverage)
  • Finger v. Audubon Ins. Co., U.S. , 2010 WL 1222274 (La. Civ. Dist. Ct. 2010) (la. latent/other exclusions; Doerr guidance applied)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Date Published: Dec 16, 2010
Citations: 759 F. Supp. 2d 822; 2010 WL 5288032; 09-6072, 09-7393, 10-688, 10-792, 10-929, 10-930, 10-931, 10-1420, 10-1693, 10-1828; MDL 2047
Docket Number: 09-6072, 09-7393, 10-688, 10-792, 10-929, 10-930, 10-931, 10-1420, 10-1693, 10-1828; MDL 2047
Court Abbreviation: E.D. La.
Log In
    In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, 759 F. Supp. 2d 822