midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2019 Ohio 2102
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother is the biological parent of C.G. (b. 2009) and G.S. (b. 2013); both lived with Mother and her husband. CSB filed complaints in March 2018 alleging drug use, domestic violence, a suicide attempt, and chronic school absences.
  • C.G. missed roughly 190 school hours in one year; school interventions and outreach to Mother largely failed. C.G. was withdrawn in school; after removal and placement with Father G., his attendance and demeanor improved.
  • Mother admitted alcohol problems, reported a recent intoxication episode requiring someone else to pick up a younger child, and tested positive on a saliva test for methamphetamine/amphetamine.
  • Reports indicated domestic violence in the home and that older children observed substance use and neglectful episodes (e.g., Mother falling asleep in bathtub). Mother claimed narcolepsy as a reason for missed obligations.
  • At the adjudicatory proceedings, CSB proceeded on C.G. (and older brothers) on May 9, 2018; service problems prevented proceeding on G.S. that day. The magistrate later entered an adjudication for G.S., but no separate evidentiary hearing for G.S. is in the record.
  • Trial court adjudicated C.G. neglected and dependent and adjudicated G.S. dependent; dispositional orders placed C.G. with Father G. and G.S. in temporary agency custody. This appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether C.G. was neglected under R.C. 2151.03(A)(3) Mother: insufficient evidence; finding against manifest weight CSB/Judge: neglect supported by school truancy plus Mother’s substance abuse, domestic violence exposure, and unresponsiveness to providers Affirmed: clear and convincing evidence showed neglect (not based solely on truancy)
Whether C.G. and G.S. were dependent under R.C. 2151.04(C) Mother: insufficient evidence; hearing defects CSB: children exposed to unsafe environment (substance abuse, domestic violence, lack of supervision) C.G.: affirmed (evidence supported dependency). G.S.: reversed for lack of a separate adjudicatory hearing; remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Hunt, 46 Ohio St.2d 378 (1976) (agency must prove allegations at adjudicatory hearing)
  • In re Adoption of Holcomb, 18 Ohio St.3d 361 (1985) (clear-and-convincing evidence standard defined)
  • Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469 (1954) (definition of clear-and-convincing standard in Ohio)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.G.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 29, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 2102; 29171
Docket Number: 29171
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In