History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re C.C.
2011 Ohio 1879
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • C.C. was adjudicated delinquent in the Lawrence County Common Pleas Court, Probate-Juvenile Division.
  • He was sentenced to six months of community control (probation) with a condition prohibiting drug or alcohol use.
  • Probation officer sought revocation after C.C. admitted to alcohol use during school; testimony indicated he drank vodka the previous night.
  • The court found C.C. in violation and sentenced him to six months of rehab at the Lawrence County Juvenile Center.
  • Appellate counsel, under Anders, identified four potential assignments of error but did not challenge the outcome on the merits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court abused its discretion on violation finding C.C. was not proven intoxicated when spoken to by officials. C.C. admitted to consuming alcohol, violating probation. Probation violation established; intoxication inconsequential to the violation.
Whether C.C. was denied phone contact with his father under Juv.R. 7(E)(2) Denied contact may implicate rights under Juv.R. 7(E)(2). No detention admission; rule not triggered or not prejudicial. Without merit; no detention admission shown or prejudice established.
Whether due process was violated by moving forward after dismissal of other cases Proceeding after dismissals violated due process protections. All parties knew of the hearing; dismissals favored C.C. No merit; proceeding did not violate due process.
Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance Ineffective assistance not demonstrated by specifics. Counsel arguments insufficient to establish deficient performance. No merit; no grounds shown for ineffective assistance.

Key Cases Cited

  • McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (U.S. Supreme Court 1970) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. Supreme Court 1984) (two-prong test for ineffective assistance)
  • State v. Issa, 93 Ohio St.3d 49 (Ohio 2001) (state standard for counsel effectiveness)
  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. Supreme Court 1967) (procedural framework for counsel to seek withdrawal on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.C.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 11, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 1879
Docket Number: 10CA44
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.