History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re C.A.
2013 Ohio 3903
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • On June 18, 2012, gunshots were fired at Daryle Dean's car near Blanche and La Croix Streets in Akron.
  • A complaint alleged 15-year-old C.A. delinquent for felonious assault; a firearm specification was added.
  • The trial adjudicated C.A. delinquent of felonious assault and the firearm specification; C.A. was committed to the Ohio Department of Youth Services for a minimum term of two years and a maximum until age twenty-one.
  • C.A. appealed asserting insufficient evidence and that the adjudications were against the manifest weight of the evidence, violating due process rights.
  • The appellate court applied sufficiency standards from adult criminal cases, reviewed credibility and conflicts in witness testimony, and affirmed the trial court’s credibility findings and conclusions.
  • No firearm was recovered; witnesses provided conflicting but circumstantial evidence linking C.A. to the shooting.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency and weight of the evidence to support delinquency C.A. argues insufficient evidence and manifest weight violate due process State contends evidence supports delinquency beyond reasonable doubt Evidence sufficient and not against the weight of the evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • In re L.M., 9th Dist. Summit No. 25693, 2012-Ohio-1025 (Ohio 2012) (sufficiency reviewed de novo in delinquency context; adult standard applied)
  • State v. Williams, 9th Dist. Summit No. 24731, 2009–Ohio–6955 (Ohio 2009) (delineates de novo sufficiency review; standard for determining guilt)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1991) (Ohio 1991) (establishes framework for evaluating sufficiency: any rational trier could convict beyond reasonable doubt)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 386 (1997) (Ohio 1997) (articulates standard for determining sufficiency; reference point for review)
  • State v. Minor, 9th Dist. Summit No. 26362, 2013-Ohio-558 (Ohio 2013) (identity element considerations; credibility affects weight)
  • Otten v. State, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (9th Dist.1986) (Ohio 1986) (weight-of-the-evidence standard; review of the entire record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.A.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 11, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 3903
Docket Number: 26690
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.