History
  • No items yet
midpage
293 Ga. 783
Ga.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Per curiam disciplinary matter against Burgess arising from six Formal Complaints seeking disbarment.
  • Special master denied Burgess’s Petition for Voluntary Discipline, struck her answers for non-response, and admitted factual findings by failure to answer.
  • Review Panel approved the master’s findings, incorporating them by reference.
  • Burgess admitted violations in S13Y1239 (misappropriation, poor communication), S13Y1241 (poor communication in divorce), S13Y1243 (late dues), S13Y1245 (limited communication), S13Y1246 (trust mismanagement and contempt), and S13Y1247 (no communication, refund issues).
  • State Bar sought disbarment; aggravating factors noted; Panel recommended two-year suspension with reinstatement conditions (LPM program and psychiatric evaluation).
  • Court ultimately disbarred Burgess, holding no prior discipline mitigates given breadth and gravity of violations, and requiring disbarment under Bar Rule 4-219(c).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether disbarment is the appropriate sanction. State Bar: multiple, serious violations; aggravating factors justify disbarment. Burgess: two-year suspension with conditions sufficient; argues mitigating factors. Disbarment is the appropriate sanction.
Whether lack of prior disciplinary history mitigates to less than disbarment. Prior history not decisive given scope of violations. No prior history should reduce sanction. No prior history not a sufficient mitigating factor; disbarment warranted.
Whether attribution of misconduct to poor law practice management affects sanction. Misconduct indicates systemic issues; supports disbarment. Violations reflect more than poor management; not excusing. Despite mitigation concerns, violations justify disbarment.

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Matter of Davis, 290 Ga. 857 (2012) (disbarment appropriate where multiple rule violations and aggravating factors)
  • In the Matter of Ellison, 282 Ga. 647 (2007) (disbarment when multiple violations of similar rules)
  • In the Matter of Williams, 281 Ga. 558 (2007) (disbarment for multiple Rule 1.15 violations)
  • In the Matter of Adams, 291 Ga. 768 (2012) (suspensions imposed on worse facts; contextual comparison)
  • In the Matter of Porges-Dodson, 274 Ga. 764 (2002) (suspension with substantial misconduct analyzed)
  • In the Matter of Ballard, 279 Ga. 663 (2005) (two-year suspension with prior history considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Burgess
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 23, 2013
Citations: 293 Ga. 783; 748 S.E.2d 916; 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2921; 2013 WL 5303262; 2013 Ga. LEXIS 722; S13Y1239, S13Y1241, S13Y1243, S13Y1245, S13Y1246, S13Y1247
Docket Number: S13Y1239, S13Y1241, S13Y1243, S13Y1245, S13Y1246, S13Y1247
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In