History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Barry (Clyde's Place LLC) Nov
16 A.3d 613
Vt.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Lake Champlain shore property in Orwell, VT; original house nonconforming with 100' lakefront setback under 1995 bylaws
  • In 2006 Clyde's Place LLC proposed replacement structure; interim zoning official discussed options and allowed footprint-based placement
  • Zoning permit issued June 5, 2006 after sketch plan and application; permit described building to be built “over” the existing footprint but terms undefined
  • Final design extended upper floors and cantilevered sections; construction commenced late 2006 and completed by spring 2007
  • April 23, 2007 NOV alleged violation of the lakefront setback (100'); DRB denied appeal; Environmental Court upheld NOV and denied new permit/variance
  • Environmental Court found permit ambiguous; held ambiguities must be construed in landowner’s favor enabling preexisting nonconforming status

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the NOV should be upheld given ambiguity in the permit terms Clyde's Place contends the as-built conforms to the ambiguous permit Town argues structure exceeded permit scope and violated bylaws No; ambiguity requires construing in landowner’s favor, reversing NOV
Whether the as-built structure is a lawful nonconforming use under the ambiguous permit As-built remains within the ambiguous permit’s scope Permit did not clearly authorize the as-built design Yes; structure remains preexisting nonconforming under ambiguous permit
Whether to address additional procedural issues (variance, estoppel) after reversal on ambiguity Requests approval as modification or variance; estoppel defenses DRB/ bylaws issues unresolved; otherwise moot if ambiguity governs Not reached; remanded for judgment in Clyde's Place LLC based on ambiguity ruling

Key Cases Cited

  • Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 152 Vt. 139 (1989) (final zoning permit cannot be collaterally attacked; argues bounds of permit)
  • Town of Bennington v. Hanson-Walbridge Funeral Home, Inc., 139 Vt. 288 (1981) (use contemplated by permit must stand; bylaws/enforcement separate)
  • In re Kostenblatt, 161 Vt. 292 (1994) (upholding NOV for bylaws violations despite permit constraints; distinguishable facts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Barry (Clyde's Place LLC) Nov
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Jan 21, 2011
Citation: 16 A.3d 613
Docket Number: 2010-013
Court Abbreviation: Vt.