History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Appeal of Springfield School District
101 A.3d 835
| Pa. Commw. Ct. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • VMDT purchased two adjoining commercial parcels in June 2011 for $11.4 million; parcels 487 and 7872 are in Springfield Township, Delaware County.
  • 2012 and 2013 assessed values: parcel 487 $3,118,530; parcel 7872 $409,471; county CLRs were 67.5% (2012) and 72% (2013).
  • School District appealed the 2012 assessments to the Board seeking base-year value of $11.4 million; Board denied the appeal; School District then appealed to trial court.
  • VMDT counterclaimed that the 1998 base-year value should govern, arguing EPR vs. CLR methodology requires base-year valuation.
  • Trial court rejected base-year approach, valued parcels using current market values and applied EPR/CLR per 8854(a)(2)-(3); uniformity challenge rejected.
  • VMDT appeals, challenging the statutory framework and the District’s property-selection process for appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether base-year valuation should govern on appeal VMDT—base-year value should control School District—base-year method not supported by law No; current market value must be used on appeal
Whether the 1998 base-year valuation could be challenged after the 40-day period Base-year valuation can be challenged on appeal No timely challenge; 40-day window expired Base-year challenge not timely; not preserved
Whether applying EPR/CLR to current value complies with uniformity Uniformity requires base-year freeze to be scrutinized EPR/CLR applied to current value; uniformity upheld Yes; court properly applied EPR/CLR to current values; uniformity not violated
Whether School District’s property-selection for appeals violates Uniformity Mooney’s threshold misused; lottery-like selection is discriminatory Threshold rational to generate revenue; not discriminatory Not discriminatory; threshold reasonable; uniformity not violated
Whether trial court’s weight of evidence supported current-value findings VMDT’s appraiser credible; current values should reflect 1998 data School District appraisers credible; current values appropriate Yes; court’s credibility determinations supported by evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Downingtown Area Sch. Dist v. Chester Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 913 A.2d 194 (Pa. 2006) (uniformity and CLR/EPR concepts in uniform taxation)
  • Clifton v. Allegheny Cnty., 969 A.2d 1197 (Pa. 2009) (uniformity requires proportional treatment across county valuations)
  • Appeal of Armco, Inc., 515 A.2d 326 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986) (administrative vs. review assessment methods; flexibility in testing base-year value)
  • Daugherty v. Cnty. of Allegheny, 920 A.2d 936 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007) (base-year method and current value on appeal; flexibility in assessment)
  • Weissenberger v. Chester Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 62 A.3d 501 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2013) (no deliberate discrimination in selective appeals; rational basis for threshold)
  • Vees v. Carbon County Board of Assessment Appeals, 867 A.2d 742 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (uniformity not violated by school district appeal policy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Appeal of Springfield School District
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 24, 2014
Citation: 101 A.3d 835
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.