midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
222 N.C. App. 418
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • IBM appeals a 2001 tax valuation of 40,779 leased computer items in Durham County.
  • This is the third appeal after IBM I (2007) and IBM II (2009), both reversing or remanding.
  • The Court previously held the County failed to prove true value and required depreciation adjustments for obsolescence.
  • On remand after new briefing, the Tax Commission issued a third final decision adopting a hybrid market/income approach.
  • The Court reverses and remands for entry of a decision reducing the assessment to IBM-listed value $96,458,707.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Burden of proof and law of the case applied IBM shift burden to County per IBM II County argues law-of-the-case supports its findings Burden shifted to County; prior law-of-the-case misapplied and reversed
Credibility and role of NACOMEX/Zises evidence NACOMEX and Zises evidence should be credited Evidence may be weighed by the Commission NACOMEX/Zises not properly sustained; findings vacated on remand
Valuation methodology on remand Hybrid method was improper and not supported by IBM II Commission may craft its own method from evidence Hybrid method rejected; explicit depreciation issues to be addressed on remand
Admission of new exhibits and evidence on remand New exhibits (Exhibits 1.2.3, 5) were not admitted Evidence can be considered if properly introduced New valuation theory without proper evidentiary basis rejected
Remedy and final relief IBM seeks value as listed by IBM Remand sufficient to correct errors Remanded for entry of assessment at IBM-listed value $96,458,707

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Appeal of AMP, Inc., 287 N.C. 547, 215 S.E.2d 752 (1975) (North Carolina Supreme Court (1975)) (competent, material and substantial evidence burden-shifting)
  • In re Southern Railway, 313 N.C. 177, 328 S.E.2d 235 (1985) (North Carolina Supreme Court (1985)) (burden shifts to county to show true value)
  • In re Appeal of Belk-Broome Co., 119 N.C. App. 470, 458 S.E.2d 921 (1996) (North Carolina Court of Appeals (1996)) (income approach as valuation method guidance)
  • Hayes v. City of Wilmington, 243 N.C. 525, 91 S.E.2d 673 (1956) (North Carolina Supreme Court (1956)) (law-of-the-case concept and decision scope)
  • Newbury v. Sea Board Air Line Ry., 160 N.C. 156, 76 S.E. 238 (1912) (North Carolina Supreme Court (1912)) (severability of judgments; divisible judgments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Appeal of IBM Credit Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 21, 2012
Citations: 222 N.C. App. 418; 731 S.E.2d 444; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1015; 2012 WL 3568301; No. COA11-1144
Docket Number: No. COA11-1144
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In