History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Aiken County
396 U.S. App. D.C. 107
| D.C. Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioners seek review of DOE and related actions regarding Yucca Mountain; DOE sought to withdraw its license application from NRC review and to abandon the Yucca Mountain project.
  • NRC Licensing Board denied DOE's motion to withdraw; the Commission has not yet decided whether to review that denial.
  • NWPA directs NRC to review the construction authorization application submitted June 17, 2008; three-year deadline may have passed.
  • DOE publicly stated it would abandon Yucca Mountain and established a Blue Ribbon Commission, among other actions.
  • Petitioners argue this behavior violates NWPA, NEPA, and the APA; DOE argues petitions are unripe and thresholds lack final agency action or jurisdiction.
  • Court dismisses for lack of jurisdiction, finding claims unripe and DOE actions non-final or non-reviewable at this stage.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether petitioners’ challenge to DOE’s withdrawal of the license is ripe. Petitioners contend DOE lacks authority to withdraw. DOE asserts issues depend on NRC proceedings and are not final. Not ripe; jurisdiction lacking.
Whether petitioners’ challenge to DOE’s abandonment of Yucca Mountain is justiciable. DOE’s abandonment violates NWPA/APA. No discrete action or final agency action; not reviewable. Not justiciable.
Whether the court has jurisdiction to review under final agency action doctrine (APA/NWPA). There is a final agency action inconsistent with law. No final action or clear duty to act violated; review premature. Lacks jurisdiction; petitions dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Abbott Labs. v. Gardner, 387 F.2d 415 (3d Cir. 1967) (ripeness and prior administrative review principles)
  • TRAC v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (mandamus for unreasonable agency delay)
  • Nuclear Energy Inst. v. EPA, 373 F.3d 1251 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (context for Yucca Mountain regulatory decisions)
  • Cobell v. Kempthorne, 455 F.3d 301 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (ongoing program not final agency action under APA)
  • Sierra Club v. Thomas, 828 F.2d 783 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (agency inaction and accountability concerns)
  • Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., U.S. , 130 S. Ct. 3138 (2010) (independent agency accountability and removal powers)
  • Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935) (independent agencies and presidential removal limits)
  • Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926) (presidential removal authority context (Myers))
  • Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986) (removal power and independence of the Comptroller General)
  • California v. FCC, 131 S. Ct. 1 (2010) (later discussion on executive control)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Aiken County
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jul 1, 2011
Citation: 396 U.S. App. D.C. 107
Docket Number: 10-1050, 10-1052, 10-1069, 10-1082
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.