In re Adoption of T.G.B.
2011 Ohio 6772
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- The Adams County probate court appointed Lobert and Beverly Bell as guardians of T.G.B. and L.L.B.
- The Bells immediately filed petitions for adoption of the two children.
- The probate court dismissed the petitions, holding the Bells must satisfy the preadoption placement requirements of R.C. 5103.16(D).
- The court acknowledged the Bells were guardians but applied the holding from In re Adoption of J.A.S. to require compliance with 5103.16(D).
- The Bells appealed, arguing guardians are exempt from 5103.16(D)’s preadoption placement requirements.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether guardians are exempt from 5103.16(D) preadoption placement requirements. | Bell(s) contend guardians are exempt under 5103.16(E). | Probate court treated guardians like non-exempt applicants under 5103.16(D) per J.A.S. | Yes, guardians are exempt; judgment reversed. |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Adoption of J.A.S., 126 Ohio St.3d 145 (2010-Ohio-3270) (distinguishes guardians from other private adoptions under 5103.16)
- In re Adoption of B.M.W., 4th Dist. No. 10CA899 (2010-Ohio-5214) (statutory interpretation framework for 5103.16)
- State v. Lowe, No. 2007-Ohio-606 (2007-Ohio-606) (plain language interpretation of statutes)
- Mathews v. Waverly, 4th Dist. No. 08CA787 (2010-Ohio-347) (interpretation of unambiguous statutes; application to cases)
- State ex rel. Savarese v. Buckeye Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 74 Ohio St.3d 543 (1996) (principles of statutory interpretation)