History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Adoption of Mjb
248 P.3d 1039
Utah Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother and Husband married since 1998; M.J.B. born May 1, 2008.
  • R.C.R. is M.J.B.'s biological father and filed a paternity action in September 2009.
  • Husband filed an independent adoption petition naming R.C.R. as biological father and seeking termination of R.C.R.'s parental rights.
  • R.C.R. was not named as a party to the adoption proceeding and apparently received no notice.
  • District court issued a Decree of Adoption on December 10, 2009 terminating R.C.R.'s parental rights and declaring Husband the adoptive father.
  • R.C.R. learned of the Decree and timely appealed; he did not intervene in the adoption proceeding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether R.C.R. has standing to appeal the Decree of Adoption. R.C.R. was aggrieved as a nonparty; he seeks review of the adoption order. R.C.R. was not a party to the adoption proceeding and failed to intervene; thus no standing to appeal. Dismissed for lack of standing.
Whether failure to name/intervene affected due process in the adoption. Paternity action preserved rights; due process requires coordination with concurrent proceedings. No party status in the adoption proceeding; due process not violated as a nonparty cannot appeal. Not necessary to decide; lacking party status defeats appeal.
Whether rule 24 (intervention) was available to establish party status. Intervention would have made R.C.R. a party eligible to appeal. Intervention was not pursued; the remedy not taken; still cannot appeal as nonparty. Intervention could have created party status; its absence bars direct appeal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Chen v. Stewart, 123 P.3d 416 (Utah 2005) (apellate standing requires party or privy status and aggrievement)
  • Society of Prof'l Journalists v. Bullock, 743 P.2d 1166 (Utah 1987) (nonparties cannot appeal as of right)
  • Sun Sur. Ins. Co., 99 P.3d 818 (Utah 2004) (nonparty appeal denied when not properly brought)
  • Tremco Consultants, Inc., 110 P.3d 678 (Utah 2005) (denial/intervention decisions are appealable; lack of intervention defeats appeal)
  • State v. Lane, 212 P.3d 529 (Utah 2009) (victim not party to criminal case; no right to appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Adoption of Mjb
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Feb 17, 2011
Citation: 248 P.3d 1039
Docket Number: 20100055-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.