History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Adoption of M.L. J.H. v. J.L. and C.L.
2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 440
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2008 the Adoptive Parents obtained guardianship over M.L. and L.H. due to concerns about supervision.
  • In Oct. 2010 the Adoptive Parents petitioned to adopt L.H.; Father contested, arguing consent was not required for three grounds and that adoption was not in L.H.’s best interests.
  • Trial court held that the three grounds for dispensing with consent were proven and adoption was in L.H.’s best interests; adoption petition was granted.
  • Father appeals, highlighting his history of substance abuse, depression, treatment avoidance, and ongoing instability in housing and employment, and argues insufficient evidence of unfitness or best interests.
  • Mother was dismissed from the proceedings; the appeal concerns only the adoption of L.H. and whether Father’s consent was dispensed with and adoption is in L.H.’s best interests.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Father’s consent dispensed with under IC 31-19-9-8 on any ground? Father Adoptive Parents Yes; evidence supported dispensing with consent on grounds of unfitness/supervision.
Is adoption in L.H.’s best interests given Father’s fitness and conduct? Adoptive Parents Father Yes; adoption serves best interests given bond with adoptive parents and lack of bond with Father.
Is there sufficient evidence to find Father unfit to parent? Adoptive Parents Father Yes; substantial evidence of long-term depression, substance abuse, treatment avoidance, instability.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Adoption of M.B., 815 N.E.2d 216 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (adoption statute reliance on fitness and best interests standards)
  • In re Adoption of M.A.S., 815 N.E.2d 216 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (clear and convincing evidence standards for dispensing with consent)
  • In re J.S., 906 N.E.2d 226 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (factors for parent fitness include substance abuse, housing, employment stability)
  • C.T. v. Marion Cnty. Dep’t of Child Servs., 896 N.E.2d 571 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (mental health, addiction, and safe, stable home as indicators of fitness)
  • In re A.B., 924 N.E.2d 666 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (addressing mental health, substance abuse, and participation in treatment as fitness indicators)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Adoption of M.L. J.H. v. J.L. and C.L.
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 7, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 440
Docket Number: 29A02-1201-AD-54
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.