History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Adoption of: J.M.W., a Minor
2855 EDA 2017
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Dec 28, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Child born April 2011 to unmarried Mother (mental-health issues) and Father, who was incarcerated at the time and has never met the Child.
  • Montgomery County OCY filed a petition on Feb 2, 2017 seeking involuntary termination of Father’s parental rights under 23 Pa.C.S. § 2511(a)(1) and (2).
  • Permanency review and evidentiary hearings were held in June 2017; Judge Murphy held an on-the-record Rule 1925(a) opinion at the Aug 22, 2017 termination hearing.
  • Father never provided financial support, gifts, visits, custody petitions, or contact with OCY; he claims attempted contact after release in 2015 was blocked, but made no further contact after parole ended March 21, 2016.
  • Since release Father completed parenting classes, obtained employment and housing (rented room), but has not remedied mental-health and substance-abuse issues, and lacks suitable housing for a child.
  • Child has bonded with foster parents; treating psychologist recommended Father focus on his own mental health and concluded it would not be in Child’s best interest for Father to be the permanent caregiver.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether OCY proved grounds for termination under § 2511(a)(1) (failure/refusal to perform parental duties or settled purpose to relinquish) OCY: Father’s long absence, no contact, no support, and failure to seek custody or visits show settled purpose/refusal to perform duties Father: Attempted post-release contact was blocked by maternal relatives and law enforcement; recent steps show willingness to parent Court: Affirmed termination under § 2511(a)(1); Father evidenced a settled purpose of relinquishing parental claim and failed to perform parental duties
Whether OCY proved grounds under § 2511(a)(2) (repeated/incapacity causing lack of essential parental care and unremedied causes) OCY: Father’s repeated incapacity (incarcerations, untreated mental-health and substance issues) left Child without essential care; conditions unlikely to be remedied promptly Father: Completed classes, obtained job and housing, argues he is working toward remediation Court: Affirmed termination under § 2511(a)(2); father’s incapacity and failures caused lack of essential care and causes unlikely to be remedied in time for Child’s needs
Whether termination promotes Child’s developmental, physical and emotional welfare under § 2511(b) OCY: Child is bonded with foster parents who meet Child’s needs; psychologist opposes reunification now Father: Claims changed circumstances and readiness to parent Court: Held termination promotes Child’s needs and welfare under § 2511(b); psychologist’s opinion and foster bond weighed for termination
Whether evidence met clear-and-convincing standard and whether six-month look-back alone controls OCY: Totality of history and post-release inaction satisfies clear-and-convincing standard; court may consider whole history beyond six months Father: Argues recent improvements should weigh against termination; cites barriers to contact Court: Applied totality of circumstances, considered explanations, and found clear-and-convincing evidence supporting termination; recent improvements were untimely and insufficient

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Interest of C.S., 761 A.2d 1197 (Pa. Super. 2000) (statutory framework for termination proceedings)
  • In re Adoption of S.M., 816 A.2d 1117 (Pa. Super. 2003) (burden and standard of proof: clear and convincing evidence)
  • In re Z.S.W., 946 A.2d 726 (Pa. Super. 2008) (interpretation of § 2511(a)(1) and required inquiries)
  • In re A.L.D., 797 A.2d 326 (Pa. Super. 2002) (§ 2511(a)(2) can include incapacity or refusal; parents must make diligent efforts)
  • In re Adoption of S.P., 47 A.3d 817 (Pa. 2012) (parental duty to maintain communication and support despite incarceration)
  • In re Adoption of K.J., 936 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. 2007) (court may reject belated attempts at cooperation as untimely)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Adoption of: J.M.W., a Minor
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 28, 2017
Docket Number: 2855 EDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.