History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Adoption of G.R.L.
26 A.3d 1124
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • OCY received multiple referrals alleging Parents’ mental health and poor living conditions; police removed Children in May 2007; court returned Children to Parents in June 2007; OCY provided services and monitored care including a life-skills program; Children remained in care due to ongoing safety concerns and Parents’ inconsistent cooperation; OCY identified potential kinship resources and pursued goal change from reunification to adoption, ultimately changing the goal in December 2009; Grandfather was not timely contacted as a resource and disclosed concerns about his suitability; termination of parental rights occurred in January 2011 and appeals were filed in February 2011.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether OCY complied with Kinship Care requirements Parents contend OCY failed to pursue Grandfather as a resource OCY documented efforts and determined relatives were not appropriate resources OCY complied; record supported continued foster care.
Whether Grandfather’s desire to adopt should have been considered at termination Grandfather’s adoption desire should be heard at termination Termination hearing not the proper stage to decide adoptive alternatives Premature to consider Grandfather’s adoption at termination; affirmed termination orders.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re J.P., 998 A.2d 984 (Pa. Super. 2010) (kinship care considerations and placement decisions)
  • In re R.P., 957 A.2d 1205 (Pa. Super. 2008) (agency may decline relative placement when not appropriate or safe)
  • In re C.J.R., 782 A.2d 568 (Pa. Super. 2001) (placement with relatives requires safety and suitability)
  • In re Davis, 502 Pa. 110 (1983) (family preservation weighed with best interests)
  • In re Hess, 530 Pa. 218 (1992) (Adoption procedures and best interests standard for final decree)
  • In re Adoption of J.D.T., 796 A.2d 992 (Pa. Super. 2002) (grandparents may participate in adoption proceedings)
  • In re Adoption of J.E.F., 587 Pa. 650 (2006) (petition to adopt must include required information and consents)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Adoption of G.R.L.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 22, 2011
Citation: 26 A.3d 1124
Docket Number: 509 EDA 2011, 510 EDA 2011, 511 EDA 2011, 512 EDA 2011
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.