History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Acer America Corp.
626 F.3d 1252
Fed. Cir.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioners seek mandamus to force transfer of a patent action from the Eastern District of Texas to the Northern District of California.
  • MedioStream filed suit in ED Texas against twelve defendants headquartered nationwide, with most in California.
  • Petitioners moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) for transfer to Northern District of California; district court denied largely due to Dell's Texas presence.
  • Most petitioners (except Dell) are California-based; no party is headquartered in the ED Texas forum.
  • The court must apply public and private forum non conveniens factors to assess transfer under § 1404(a).
  • The court grants mandamus, directing vacatur of denial and transfer to the Northern District of California.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether mandamus should be granted to transfer venue. DC seeks transfer due to multiple California witnesses and evidence. Dell's Texas presence weighs against transfer. Yes; petition granted.
What factors govern transfer in this § 1404(a) context. Factors favor transfer: witnesses, sources of proof, local interest, and access to process. No meaningful counterbalancing factors in ED Texas. Factors significantly favor transfer to California.
Do the court's previous venue-transfer standards apply here. Precedents support transfer when transferee venue is clearly more convenient. Some cases rely on similar private/public interest factors. Applicable; factors favor transfer.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Nintendo Co., 589 F.3d 1194 (Fed.Cir.2009) (mandamus to correct patently erroneous denial of transfer)
  • In re Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 587 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2009) (emphasizes contrasts between venues in transfer analysis)
  • In re Genentech, Inc., 566 F.3d 1338 (Fed.Cir.2009) (forum non conveniens considerations in transfer decisions)
  • In re TS Tech USA Corp., 551 F.3d 1315 (Fed.Cir.2008) (private/public factors in transfer to assess convenience)
  • In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 545 F.3d 304 (5th Cir.2008) (en banc; forum non conveniens factors guide transfer)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Acer America Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Dec 3, 2010
Citation: 626 F.3d 1252
Docket Number: 2010-M942
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.