midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
111 Cal.App.5th 1048
Cal. Ct. App.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • In September 2023, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) investigated allegations that Mother (F.O.) physically abused her son, A.O.
  • A.O. was removed from Mother’s custody after reports and visible evidence of physical abuse, and he made statements to authorities implicating his Mother.
  • The juvenile court detained A.O. and ultimately ordered that any visitation between A.O. and Mother occur in a therapeutic setting due to concerns about A.O.'s emotional well-being.
  • Despite Mother’s completion of certain court-ordered programs, significant barriers and delays in arranging therapeutic visitation resulted in Mother having no contact with A.O. during the review period.
  • At the six-month review hearing, the court found that DCFS had provided reasonable reunification services and continued those services for Mother.
  • Mother appealed solely the finding that reasonable reunification services had been provided.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a parent may appeal only the reasonable services finding in a juvenile court order DCFS: No, such a finding is not independently appealable Mother: Yes, the finding is adverse and appealable as it impacts reunification rights Yes, a parent may appeal this specific finding as it aggrieves their interests
Whether DCFS provided reasonable reunification services to Mother DCFS: Services were reasonable given circumstances and child’s needs Mother: Services were not reasonable due to lack of efforts to effect therapeutic visits Substantial evidence supports the court’s finding that services were reasonable

Key Cases Cited

  • In re T.G., 188 Cal.App.4th 687 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (recognizing a parent is aggrieved by an unreasonable services finding and can appeal)
  • Melinda K. v. Superior Court, 116 Cal.App.4th 1147 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) (earlier held such findings not appealable, but superseded by later cases)
  • In re S.B., 46 Cal.4th 529 (Cal. 2009) (findings in appealable orders are reviewable on appeal)
  • Michael G. v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.5th 609 (Cal. 2023) (erroneous reasonable services finding can impair reunification rights and appellate review is appropriate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re A.O.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 10, 2025
Citations: 111 Cal.App.5th 1048; B339164
Docket Number: B339164
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In