History
  • No items yet
midpage
89 A.3d 1058
Del.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Feuerhake was admitted in 1987 and suspended for two years on July 13, 2010.
  • The Suspension Order barred practicing law, receiving fees, and contacting clients except for pre-existing earned fees.
  • During suspension, Feuerhake worked as a paralegal for Jeffrey K. Martin but did not share the Order or its restrictions with Martin.
  • Post-suspension, Feuerhake communicated with clients, attended depositions, and discussed case issues, effectively practicing law again.
  • He received a $39,466.66 contingency fee from a settlement for work performed before and after suspension and kept full payment.
  • ODC filed a Petition for Discipline in 2013; Panel found violations of Rules 3.4(c), 8.4(d), and Rule 7(c), and recommended disbarment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Feuerhake violate suspension terms by practicing and accepting fees? Feuerhake knowingly violated the suspension order. Feuerhake argues for extended suspension rather than disbarment. Yes; violations established by clear and convincing evidence.
Did the conduct prejudice the administration of justice? Conduct undermined trust and public confidence in the system. Feuerhake contends actions were minimal or incidental under supervision. Yes; conduct was prejudicial to justice.
Is disbarment the appropriate sanction given ABA Standards and aggravating factors? Disbarment is appropriate due to prior discipline and ongoing pattern. Feuerhake seeks extended suspension, not disbarment. Disbarment warranted.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re McCann, 894 A.2d 1087 (Del. 2005) (suspended lawyer disbarred for continuing to handle matters)
  • In re Davis, 43 A.3d 856 (Del. 2012) (disbarment for knowingly disobeying suspension)
  • Tonwe, 929 A.2d 774 (Del. 2007) (continued practice after cease-and-desist order)
  • In re Steiner, 817 A.2d 793 (Del. 2003) (contextual guidance on disciplinary standards)
  • In re Mekler, 672 A.2d 23 (Del. 1995) (public impression of court permitting suspended practice)
  • In re Abbott, 925 A.2d 482 (Del. 2007) (quoting disciplinary standards framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware Feuerhake
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Apr 4, 2014
Citations: 89 A.3d 1058; 2014 Del. LEXIS 159; 2014 WL 1347099; No. 41, 2014
Docket Number: No. 41, 2014
Court Abbreviation: Del.
Log In
    In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware Feuerhake, 89 A.3d 1058