History
  • No items yet
midpage
587 F. App'x 273
6th Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Rubin and her then-husband defaulted on a mortgage secured by their West Bloomfield home.
  • MERS held the mortgage; MERS later assigned it to BAC, which served Fannie Mae/BANA interests.
  • BAC pursued foreclosure; BANA purchased at sheriff's sale and quitclaimed to Fannie Mae.
  • FHFA, as conservator for Fannie Mae, intervened in the eviction action that followed the foreclosure.
  • Case was removed to federal court; FHFA and Fannie Mae moved to dismiss and the district court granted the motion.
  • Court affirmed dismissal, holding no viable claim under Rule 12(b)(6) or state-law grounds after redemption period elapsed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Fannie Mae is a state actor for due process purposes Rubin asserts due process rights because Fannie Mae acts as a state surrogate Fannie Mae is not a state actor, even under FHFA conservatorship Fannie Mae is not a state actor; no Fifth Amendment violation
Whether the sale price violated Michigan law on fairness of sheriff’s sale Rubin claims $448,851.61 was over fair market value Price compliance under § 600.3228; no proof of fraud or irregularity Claim not addressed due to lapse of redemption period and lack of fraud/irregularity tied to foreclosure
Whether redemption period issues bar claims after lapse N/A Redemption rights extinguish post-period; fraud/irregularity needed Post-redemption claims limited; court declined to apply § 600.3228 absent foreclosure-related fraud/irregularity

Key Cases Cited

  • Mik v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 743 F.3d 149 (6th Cir. 2014) (Freddie Mac not a state actor; supports non-state-actor conclusion)
  • Lebron v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374 (1995) (permanent government control requisite for state actor status; FHFA conservatorship temporary)
  • Dias v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (D. Haw. 2013) (district court holding not state actor; aligns with Mik)
  • Lopez v. Bank of America, N.A., 920 F. Supp. 2d 798 (W.D. Mich. 2013) (not a state actor; foreclosure actions not due-process violations)
  • Herron v. Fannie Mae, 857 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D.D.C. 2012) (reaffirms non-state-actor status of GSEs under FHFA)
  • Conlin v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 714 F.3d 355 (6th Cir. 2013) (post-foreclosure redemption and fraud standards; relates to setting aside foreclosure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ilanit Rubin v. Fannie Mae
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 29, 2014
Citations: 587 F. App'x 273; 13-1010
Docket Number: 13-1010
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In
    Ilanit Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 F. App'x 273