History
  • No items yet
midpage
385 S.W.3d 880
Ark. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • International purchased ACQ-treated plywood from Hoover, via Osmose, for subflooring on school buses between Aug 2002 and Aug 2003.
  • After installation, corrosion issues were reported on aluminum wheelchair tracks and mounting bolts/lifts.
  • International filed suit on Jul 31, 2006, asserting breach of warranty, negligence, strict liability, and a breach-of-contract claim against Hoover.
  • Osmose moved for summary judgment (Dec 15, 2008) arguing the three-year Arkansas Product Liability Act limitations barred the claims.
  • Hoover joined (Jan 20, 2009) arguing three-year PL Act limit and a one-year UCC-based limit for warranty.
  • The circuit court granted summary judgment (Aug 31, 2010), finding International’s claims were barred by the three-year statute; remedial actions and knowledge before Aug 2003 supported the finding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are International's claims barred by statute of limitations? International Osmose/Hoover Yes; three-year PL Act applies, barring claims filed after limitations period.
Did discovery show awareness of corrosion more than three years before filing? International Osmose/Hoover No; evidence shows knowledge or reasonably discoverable connection by 2002, triggering accrual.
Should warranty claims be governed by UCC 4-2-725 or PL Act 16-116-103? International Osmose/Hoover PL Act controls; warranty claims fall within product liability limitations.
Is the one-year invoice-period limitation against Hoover dispositive? International Hoover Moot; PL Act is controlling, and claims still barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Martin v. Arthur, 339 Ark. 149 (1999) (discovery rule for products liability accrual)
  • Follette v. Wal-Mart Stores, 41 F.3d 1234 (8th Cir. 1994) (statute-of-limitations accrual and product liability scope)
  • Wagner v. Gen. Motors Corp., 370 Ark. 268 (2007) (fact issues can bar summary judgment where statute may apply)
  • Alexander v. Twin City Bank, 322 Ark. 478 (1995) (general limitations and accrual standards)
  • Tony Smith Trucking v. Woods & Woods, Ltd., 75 Ark.App. 134 (2001) (summary judgment and statute of limitations guidance)
  • Harvest Rice, Inc. v. Fritz & Mertice Lehman Elevator & Dryer, Inc., 365 Ark. 573 (2006) (standard for assessing material facts in summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: IC Corp. v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Oct 5, 2011
Citations: 385 S.W.3d 880; 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 637; 2011 Ark. App. 589; No. CA 10-1266
Docket Number: No. CA 10-1266
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
Log In
    IC Corp. v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc., 385 S.W.3d 880