History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hylton v. Gunter
142 Conn. App. 548
Conn. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Trial court found in favor of plaintiff on eight counts with $342,648 in compensatory damages.
  • Court awarded punitive damages in the form of attorney’s fees for four counts, conditioned on an affidavit of fees.
  • defendant Garfield Gunter appealed March 14, 2011 judgment before punitive-damages amount was finalized.
  • Trial court later awarded $23,400 in punitive damages representing attorney’s fees after the appeal was filed.
  • Appellate issue was whether the undetermined punitive damages amount rendered the judgment nonfinal under controlling case law.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the judgment was final for appeal purposes Hylton asserts finality despite unresolved punitive damages. Gunter contends the trial court had not determined punitive damages, so judgment wasn’t final. Appeal dismissed for lack of final judgment
Distinction between punitive damages and attorney’s fees Punitive damages were awarded as fees; finality hinges on recoverability/amount. Amounts pending determination prevent finality and review. Court follows Lord and Paranteau; finality depends on punitive-damages determination
Applicable finality standard under statutory framework § 52-263 threshold questions govern appeal from final judgments. Same statute requires final judgment before merits review. Threshold finality governs; appeal dismissed as nonfinal

Key Cases Cited

  • Lord v. Mansfield, 50 Conn. App. 21, 717 A.2d 267 (Conn. App. 1998) (punitive damages differ from attorney’s fees; finality distinction)
  • Paranteau v. DeVita, 208 Conn. 515, 544 A.2d 634 (Conn. 1988) (judgment on merits final even if fees pending)
  • Perkins v. Colonial Cemeteries, Inc., 53 Conn. App. 646, 734 A.2d 1010 (Conn. App. 1999) (distinguishes punitive damages from CUTPA fee recoveries)
  • Plikus v. Plikus, 26 Conn. App. 174, 599 A.2d 392 (Conn. App. 1991) (attorney’s fees may be part of punitive damages under certain circumstances)
  • Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co., 193 Conn. 208, 477 A.2d 988 (Conn. 1984) (limitations on punitive damages and litigation expenses)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hylton v. Gunter
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: May 14, 2013
Citation: 142 Conn. App. 548
Docket Number: AC 33316
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.