History
  • No items yet
midpage
886 N.W.2d 355
S.D.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • SD Supreme Court reviews timeliness of writ of certiorari challenging Sully County Board of Adjustment CUP for Ring-Neck ethanol plant.
  • Board granted CUP on July 20, 2015; approved minutes August 4, 2015 with added language to condition f.
  • Added language required applicant to fund road improvements unless funding sources unavailable.
  • Petition for writ of certiorari filed August 20, 2015 in circuit court.
  • Circuit court dismissed, finding petition untimely under SDCL 11-2-61; Ring-Neck intervened.
  • On appeal, petitioners challenge timeliness and various open-meetings/authority issues, but timeliness is dispositive.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of petition for writ of certiorari under SDCL 11-2-61 Petition timely under 30-day filing. Filing occurred 31 days after the July 20 decision filing. Petition untimely; circuit court affirmed dismissal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Elliott v. Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Lake Cty., 2005 S.D. 92 (S.D. 2005) (jurisdictional review limits on appeals; statutory timeframes)
  • Elliott v. Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Lake Cty., 2007 S.D. 6 (S.D. 2007) (de novo review of jurisdiction questions)
  • Jundt v. Fuller, 2007 S.D. 62 (S.D. 2007) (agency may correct erroneous adjudications within time limits)
  • Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 360 N.W.2d 384 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985) (agency corrective authority referenced in context of timeliness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hyde v. Sully County Board of Adjustment
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 28, 2016
Citations: 886 N.W.2d 355; 2016 WL 5637003; 2016 SD 65; 2016 S.D. LEXIS 110; 27702
Docket Number: 27702
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
Log In
    Hyde v. Sully County Board of Adjustment, 886 N.W.2d 355