History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hurley v. Austin
2013 Ohio 5592
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Hurley v. Austin involves a Fitz separation and divorce between a mother and father with three children; custody was with mother, and child support issues were referred to a magistrate.
  • The father, originally employed as an assistant prosecutor, pled guilty to criminal charges including a fifth-degree felony, leading to license suspension and resignation; his income consists of pensions and rental income.
  • Dissolution proceedings occurred with the parties agreeing on custody and property but not on child support, which was referred to a magistrate.
  • Temporary child support orders issued in 2012 imputed $85,200 in annual income to father, with support for two or three children calculated accordingly.
  • In 2013, the magistrate imputed $55,828 annual income to father (up from the temporary order) and ordered $788 monthly support plus a 2% processing charge; mother appealed.
  • The trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision; the Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Imputed income level for calculating support Hurley argues income should reflect prior higher earnings Austin contends higher imputed income is warranted given past earnings Imputation to $55,828 was not an abuse of discretion
Emancipated child M.H. lacking support Mother contends M.H. should have received support despite emancipation Father argues no support obligation for M.H. due to emancipation Lack of timely objections waived some issues; remand on credits related to M.H.
Credit for payments to third parties not through CSEA Credits for pre- and post-July 11, 2012 payments should not apply if not through CSEA Some pre- and post- order payments were valid credits Credit for payments for M.H. was improper; remand to determine proper credits for two youngest children

Key Cases Cited

  • Brownlee v. Brownlee, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga Nos. 97037 and 97105 (2012-Ohio-1539) (trial court’s imputation and earning-capacity considerations in child support)
  • Groves v. Groves, 2009-Ohio-931 (12th Dist. Clermont) (voluntary/unpaid and earning capacity factors in support determinations)
  • Glassman v. Offenberg, 2006-Ohio-3837 (8th Dist. Cuyahoga) (statutory factors for imputing income in child support)
  • Flege v. Flege, 2004-Ohio-1929 (12th Dist. Butler) (interpretation of earning capacity and support obligations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hurley v. Austin
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 19, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 5592
Docket Number: 99992
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.