History
  • No items yet
midpage
854 F. Supp. 2d 1301
N.D. Ga.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff is a tax preparer who sold the Shelter, deemed abusive by the IRS, triggering penalties and suspension.
  • The Shelter was tied to AdaCon’s Program marketed to businesses, with a claimed $5,000 disabled access tax credit.
  • Plaintiff sold the Shelter from 2002–2004 and earned $101,459 in commissions.
  • The IRS issued a Notice of Penalty Charge for promoting an abusive tax shelter on Sept. 10, 2007, after which Plaintiff paid 15% and filed a refund claim.
  • In 2009, the IRS denied the refund claim and suspended Plaintiff from the e-file program for two years, with the suspension starting April 16, 2009; Plaintiff filed suit on May 20, 2011,

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court has jurisdiction over the action Plaintiff seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) and argues divisible penalties allow suit Defendant argues lack of jurisdiction due to timing under § 6703(c) and full-payment rule Court has jurisdiction; divisible-penalty rule applied to permit suit
Whether § 6703(c) provides a jurisdictional hook § 6703(c) allows suit after paying 15% If 30-day/six-month condition not met, § 6703(c) does not apply § 6703(c) does not provide jurisdiction because Plaintiff did not sue within the required window
Whether paying a divisible portion of the penalty suffices to invoke jurisdiction Partial payment on a single sale suffices to trigger jurisdiction IRS calculation method (annual vs per-sale) challenges divisibility Partial payment on a single sale suffices; penalty is divisible per sale under § 6700(a)

Key Cases Cited

  • Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (U.S. 1960) (full-payment rule and divisibility recognized for penalties)
  • Gates v. United States, 874 F.2d 584 (8th Cir. 1989) (divisible penalties under per-transaction theory)
  • Noske v. United States, 911 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1990) (divisibility of § 6700 penalties acknowledged under per-transaction approach)
  • Dalton v. United States, 800 F.2d 1316 (4th Cir. 1986) (recognizes divisibility under § 6703/6700 framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Humphrey v. United States
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Date Published: Dec 19, 2011
Citations: 854 F. Supp. 2d 1301; 2011 WL 7662515; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154857; Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-01647-SCJ
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-01647-SCJ
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ga.
Log In
    Humphrey v. United States, 854 F. Supp. 2d 1301