History
  • No items yet
midpage
Humberto Martinez-Benitez v. State
02-14-00440-CR
| Tex. App. | Dec 17, 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Humberto Martinez-Benitez pleaded guilty to murder for shooting his cousin Jacob; jury assessed punishment at 90 years.
  • Police found a loaded firearm under the passenger seat after stopping Appellant's vehicle shortly after the shooting.
  • Appellant made inculpatory statements and entered an open plea of guilty to the offense as alleged in the indictment.
  • The judgment included an affirmative deadly-weapon finding: "Yes, a Firearm."
  • Appellant appealed, challenging (1) the validity of the deadly-weapon finding and (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel for (a) allegedly inviting a long sentence and (b) failing to assert self-defense.

Issues

Issue Appellant's Argument State's Argument Held
Validity of deadly-weapon finding Indictment did not expressly call the firearm a "deadly weapon" and punishment charge/ verdict did not incorporate the indictment Appellant pled guilty to the indictment alleging shooting with a firearm (a per se deadly weapon); judicial confession supports finding Affirmed — guilty plea to indictment that alleged shooting with a firearm supports an affirmative deadly-weapon finding
Counsel ineffective for "inviting" long sentence Trial counsel invited jury to impose lengthy confinement to protect Appellant from a drug trafficker (prosecutor remark) Counsel argued for a lower sentence; prosecutor’s remark does not show counsel’s deficiency Overruled — record does not show deficient performance
Counsel ineffective for not asserting self-defense Counsel should have argued self-defense based on evidence Jacob was "coming at" Appellant and Appellant’s fear of a cartel relative Trial record lacks explanation from counsel about strategy; no developed record to show deficiency or prejudice Overruled — appellate record undeveloped; cannot infer deficient performance

Key Cases Cited

  • Ex parte Huskins, 176 S.W.3d 818 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (guilty plea to indictment including deadly-conduct allegation supports deadly-weapon finding)
  • Ex parte Campbell, 716 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (indictment charging murder by shooting with a handgun supports deadly-weapon finding)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (two-prong standard for ineffective assistance: deficient performance and prejudice)
  • Menefield v. State, 363 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (direct appeal usually inadequate vehicle for ineffective-assistance claims; counsel should be given chance to explain)
  • Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (ineffective-assistance claims must be firmly founded in the record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Humberto Martinez-Benitez v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 17, 2015
Docket Number: 02-14-00440-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.