History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 2101
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Hulls alleged Mary Chambers’s account was payable-on-death to them; after Chambers’s death the bank refused to pay.
  • Hulls claimed misrepresentation that the account was not payable-on-death, leading them to sign a release to Chambers’s estate.
  • Hulls argued the bank failed to preserve records showing their interest in the account.
  • Hulls sought equitable and monetary relief, including remedies affecting all depositors and potentially punitive damages.
  • Bank moved to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(1); trial court dismissed, holding Hulls’ claims were primarily equitable and not properly within municipal court jurisdiction; appeal affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Municipal court jurisdiction over equitable claims Hull, via Hulls, argues municipal court may hear equitable aspects of contract-related claims. Charter One contends municipal court lacks jurisdiction for broad equitable relief and that action is interpleader/properly probate. Municipal court lacks jurisdiction; probate court proper
Whether the claim sounds in contract or equity Hulls asserted contractual duties and damages arising from mismanagement of a payable-on-death account. Bank argues the claim is non-monetary equitable relief and the grievance is improperly framed as contract. Complaint sounded primarily in equity; RC 1901.18(A)(2) inapplicable
Interpleader and alternative jurisdiction Hulls seek relief distinct from interpleader relief. Bank contends interpleader jurisdiction in probate is appropriate for determining rightful beneficiaries. RC 1901.18(A)(6) inapplicable; interpleader not invoked

Key Cases Cited

  • Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, 101 Ohio St.3d 74 (2004) (distinguishes equitable remedies from monetary damages)
  • Rose v. Assoc. Discount Corp., 169 Ohio St. 321 (1959) (power of municipal court limited by jurisdictional statutes)
  • Blenheim Homes, Inc. v. Mathews, 119 Ohio App.3d 44 (1985) (municipal courts’ jurisdiction over contract-based actions)
  • Interim Healthcare of Columbus, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Administrative Servs., 2008-Ohio-2286 (Ohio App. Dist.) (claims sounding in equity vs. money damages for agency actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hull v. Charter One Bank
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 23, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 2101; 99308
Docket Number: 99308
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Hull v. Charter One Bank, 2013 Ohio 2101