History
  • No items yet
midpage
887 N.W.2d 641
Mich. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Hudsonville Creamery invested in an approved brownfield project under the former SBTA and received $800,000 in brownfield redevelopment credits, most of which were unused in 2005–2007 and carried forward after SBTA repeal.
  • The MBTA (effective for tax years after 2007) at MCL 208.1437(18) was later amended (2008 PA 89) to allow a taxpayer to elect an 85% refund of an excess "credit allowed under this section for the tax year," in exchange for forgoing the remaining 15% and any carryforward.
  • Petitioner claimed a 2008 MBTA refund of $619,390 (85% of its remaining carryforward) after claiming a smaller MBTA credit that year; Treasury denied the refund, treating SBTA-origin carryforwards as nonrefundable.
  • The Michigan Tax Tribunal granted summary disposition to the Department of Treasury, holding refunds were available only for credits earned in the tax year, not for carryforwards from SBTA.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed: it held the ordinary meaning of "credit" (and IRS/26 U.S.C. §38 structure) includes carryforwards, and MCL 208.1437(18) expressly treats SBTA carryforwards as credits "claimable against the tax imposed under this act," so petitioner was entitled to the 85% refund.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether SBTA-origin carryforward credits qualify as a "credit allowed under this section" for purposes of MCL 208.1437(18)’s 85% refund option Carryforwards are part of a year’s "credit"; statute and federal credit structure treat carryforwards as credits, so petitioner may elect 85% refund on carried credits Refund provision omits the word "carryforward" (present earlier in subsection), so Legislature intended refunds only for credits attributable to the tax year, not SBTA carryforwards Reversed MTT: carryforwards are encompassed in "credit allowed under this section," so petitioner entitled to 85% refund on its 2008 carried brownfield credits

Key Cases Cited

  • Spartan Stores, Inc. v. Grand Rapids, 307 Mich App 565 (court reviews MTT legal questions de novo)
  • Briggs Tax Serv., LLC v. Detroit Pub. Sch., 485 Mich 69 (statutory interpretation principles)
  • Mid-American Energy Co. v. Dep’t of Treasury, 308 Mich App 362 (read statute as whole; give ordinary meaning)
  • Ashley Capital, LLC v. Dep’t of Treasury, 314 Mich App 1 (carryforward credits from SBTA treated as credits under MBTA)
  • Jenkins v. Patel, 471 Mich 158 (avoid rendering statutory language nugatory)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hudsonville Creamery & Ice Cream Co. v. Department of Treasury
Court Name: Michigan Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 29, 2016
Citations: 887 N.W.2d 641; 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 648; 314 Mich. App. 726; Docket 322968
Docket Number: Docket 322968
Court Abbreviation: Mich. Ct. App.
Log In
    Hudsonville Creamery & Ice Cream Co. v. Department of Treasury, 887 N.W.2d 641