Holverson v. Lundberg
2016 ND 103
| N.D. | 2016Background
- In 1978 Holverson purchased a 40.4-acre tract from the Gabriel J. Brown Trust by contract for deed requiring down payment and annual payments; time was made "of the essence."
- In 1980 the Trust released 5.09 acres to Holverson and took a mortgage on that parcel, subordinated to a bank mortgage.
- Holverson made sporadic payments for years; in 1997 parties amended the contract and mortgage (subordinating the Trust to a $40,000 Capital Credit Union loan) and set a new payment schedule through 2008.
- The Trust alleges Holverson executed and later satisfied multiple other mortgages on the land and that he misrepresented facts to induce the 1997 amendment; the Trust began cancellation proceedings in December 2012 and demanded payment in 2013.
- Holverson tendered a certified check for the balance in June 2013; the Trust refused and Holverson sued to quiet title and compel conveyance. The Trust counterclaimed for fraud (rescission) and for breach (damages).
- The district court granted summary judgment for Holverson, ordered conveyance, dismissed the Trust’s counterclaims, and (after appeal and amendment) the Supreme Court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Holverson's Argument | Lundberg/Trust's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether triable issues exist on Trust’s fraud-based rescission claim | Holverson denied fraud; argued statute bars late claims and that acceptance of payments waived time-of-payment clause | Trust argued Holverson made promises he never intended to keep and fraudulently induced the 1997 amendment; alleged trustee discovered fraud only in 2013 | Court assumed facts favoring Trust but held fraud/rescission claims are time-barred by limitations (discovery/constructive notice in Nov. 1997) |
| When fraud claim accrued under statute of limitations | Holverson: accrual occurred when Trust had constructive notice of recorded instruments in 1997 | Trust: subjective discovery was in 2013, so claim is timely | Court applied discovery rule objectively: trustee was charged with constructive notice of recorder’s office in Nov. 1997, so claim accrued then and is barred by 2013 filing |
| Whether acceptance of sporadic late payments waived "time is of the essence" clause | Holverson: long acceptance of late/reduced payments waived the clause and barred damages remedy; he cured default under statutory cure period | Trust: waiver argument premised on fraud or was otherwise disputed | Court held as a matter of law the Trust waived the time-of-payment provision by accepting payments for 30+ years; thus Holverson entitled to conveyance |
| Whether triable issue exists on damages for breach of contract (alternative claim) | Holverson: remedies for breach are barred by waiver and statute; tender cured default | Trust: alternatively seeks damages if rescission denied; disputes exist about measurement and facts | Court dismissed damages claim as barred by limitations (to extent premised on fraud) and, separate from fraud, waiver precluded contractual damages arising from time-of-payment breaches |
Key Cases Cited
- Tibert v. Nodak Mut. Ins. Co., 816 N.W.2d 31 (N.D. 2012) (summary judgment standards)
- Podrygula v. Bray, 856 N.W.2d 791 (N.D. 2014) (discovery rule and constructive notice principles)
- Jones v. Barnett, 619 N.W.2d 490 (N.D. 2000) (discovery rule: notice of facts puts a party on inquiry)
- Wells v. First Am. Bank West, 598 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 1999) (objective discovery rule analysis)
- Erickson v. Brown, 747 N.W.2d 34 (N.D. 2008) (fraud versus deceit; fraudulent inducement requires factual inquiry)
- Vanderhoof v. Gravel Prods., Inc., 404 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 1987) (constructive notice of recorded instruments affecting title)
- First Nat. Bank v. Big Bend Land Co., 164 N.W. 322 (N.D. 1917) (senior encumbrancer and constructive notice discussion)
- Langenes v. Bullinger, 328 N.W.2d 241 (N.D. 1982) (limits on remedies for contract-for-deed vendors)
