History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hollis v. Weatherford US LP
1:16-cv-00252
E.D. Cal.
Jan 12, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Eric Hollis worked for Weatherford US LP as a Completion Specialist from March 2, 2012 to October 2, 2012 and was classified as exempt.
  • Hollis sued under California wage-and-hour laws and asserted representative claims under the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) for alleged unpaid wages and overtime.
  • During discovery Hollis admitted he had previously signed a severance and release that he acknowledged released claims related to his employment, including PAGA claims.
  • After deposition the parties negotiated a settlement: Hollis agreed to dismiss and release his PAGA claims; Weatherford agreed to waive all defense costs.
  • Hollis moved for court approval of the PAGA settlement pursuant to Cal. Lab. Code § 2699.3; the court evaluated fairness given the plaintiff's admissions, the merits, and arm’s-length negotiations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court should approve the proposed settlement and release of PAGA claims Hollis argued settlement was fair given small amount in controversy, the prior release, litigation risks, and that experienced counsel negotiated at arm’s length Weatherford relied on the prior release and negotiated to obtain dismissal in exchange for waiving defense costs Court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, confirmed the release, dismissed the action with prejudice, and directed entry of judgment under the settlement

Key Cases Cited

  • Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior Court, 134 Cal. App. 4th 365 (2005) (explains PAGA’s purpose as a supplement to state enforcement of labor laws)
  • Arias v. Superior Court, 46 Cal. 4th 969 (2009) (PAGA plaintiff acts as proxy for the State in seeking civil penalties)
  • Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014) (PAGA suits function as substitute for government enforcement and seek civil penalties)
  • Villacres v. ABM Indus. Inc., 117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 398 (2010) (PAGA is limited to recovery of civil penalties)
  • Nordstrom Commission Cases, 186 Cal. App. 4th 576 (2010) (courts have discretion to approve PAGA settlements where fair)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hollis v. Weatherford US LP
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Jan 12, 2017
Docket Number: 1:16-cv-00252
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.