History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holley v. Ace American Insurance Co.
2013 OK 88
| Okla. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Oklahoma employment contract and Workers' Compensation Act apply irrespective of where injury occurs if contract entered in Oklahoma.
  • Deceasedworker died at a Texas jobsite, but within the scope of employment.
  • Widow could elect to receive death benefits under Texas law or Oklahoma law.
  • Insurer paid Texas-law death benefits to the widow.
  • Widow also recovered Texas-law tort damages; dispute centers on whether Oklahoma-law subrogation applies despite her election.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does Oklahoma's subrogation prohibition apply to death benefits paid under Texas law? Insurer: Texas-subrogation rights apply since benefits and tort recovery arose under Texas law. Widow: Oklahoma policy protections bar subrogation for death benefits, regardless of Texas-law award. Yes; Oklahoma prohibits subrogation for death benefits, regardless of award jurisdiction.
Does §4's election framework allow Texas adjudication to foreclose Oklahoma subrogation rights? Insurer: election to Texas law should not invoke Oklahoma subrogation protections. Widow: election under §4 fixes rights under another state's law and precludes Oklahoma subrogation. Election to pursue benefits under another state's law forecloses Oklahoma subrogation rights.
Can the widow seek declaratory relief on subrogation without filing an Oklahoma Workers' Compensation claim? Insurer: not necessary to file a claim; issues arise under Oklahoma law. Widow: declaratory relief is proper to resolve a live controversy; no claim filing requirement. Yes; declaratory judgment appropriate; no claim filing needed to resolve subrogation issue.

Key Cases Cited

  • Knott v. Halliburton Services, 752 P.2d 812 (Okla. 1988) (limits of when rights vest and application of later amendments)
  • Knoit v. Halliburton Services, 752 P.2d 812 (Okla. 1988) (statutory basis of workers' compensation rights fixed at time of injury)
  • Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay County, 595 P.2d 435 (Okla. 1979) (two remedies election principle in workers' compensation context)
  • Independent School District No. 89 v. McReynolds, 528 P.2d 313 (Okla. 1974) (rights of survivors fixed as of date of death; law applicable at death governs)
  • McBride v. Grand Island Express, Inc., 246 P.3d 718 (Okla. 2010) (clarifies the scope of §44(b) subrogation in death-benefit context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Holley v. Ace American Insurance Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Oct 22, 2013
Citation: 2013 OK 88
Docket Number: No. 110247
Court Abbreviation: Okla.