History
  • No items yet
midpage
HOGUES v. State
313 Ga. App. 717
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hogues was convicted of felony theft by receiving stolen property.
  • Laurel Mason used a residential cleaning service; Hogues sometimes assisted in cleaning Mason's house in July–August 2006.
  • In July 2006 Mason misplaced a ruby/diamond ring; in August she noticed a second ring missing and later a third.
  • A ring matching the description of the missing ring was found in Hogues's possession; Mason’s husband identified it at trial; appraiser valued the ring at $5,200.
  • Hogues testified the ring shown to the cleaner owner was his property and not Mason's; a friend testified he had purchased a different ruby/diamond ring.
  • The trial court admitted Hogues's prior felony convictions to impeach him; the court found the probative value outweighed prejudice; Hogues challenged this on appeal, arguing improper balancing and non-dishonest prior offenses.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence for theft by receiving stolen property Hogues possessed stolen ring; knowledge of theft alleged Questioned possession and ownership; insufficient link to theft Evidence sufficient; reasonable juror could find elements beyond reasonable doubt
Admissibility of prior felony convictions for impeachment Court failed to conduct proper balancing and record statutory findings Court properly weighed probative value against prejudice on record Court made express balancing findings; admissibility upheld
Adequacy of the trial court’s statutory findings under OCGA 24-9-84.1 Findings did not satisfy the statute Findings satisfied statutory intent, even in power of new trial order Express findings on admissibility satisfied OCGA 24-9-84.1 requirements

Key Cases Cited

  • DeLong v. State, 270 Ga.App. 173 (Ga. App. 2004) (relevance of possession/ownership in theft-by-receiving cases)
  • Quiroz v. State, 291 Ga.App. 423 (Ga. App. 2008) (necessity of balancing test for prior convictions)
  • Carter v. State, 303 Ga.App. 142 (Ga. App. 2010) (express findings on admissibility satisfy OCGA 24-9-84.1)
  • Clements v. State, 299 Ga.App. 561 (Ga. App. 2009) (whether prior conviction involves dishonesty for credibility purposes)
  • Hopkins v. State, 309 Ga.App. 298 (Ga. App. 2011) (prior burglary conviction upheld for impeachment where credibility relevant)
  • Whitaker v. State, 283 Ga. 521 (Ga. 2008) (clarifies applicability of prior felonies to impeachment)
  • Wilkes v. State, 293 Ga.App. 724 (Ga. App. 2008) (prior felonies admissible under 24-9-84.1 governing impeachment)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1989) (sufficiency standard for evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: HOGUES v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 26, 2012
Citation: 313 Ga. App. 717
Docket Number: A11A2291
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.