Hobbs v. Gordon
2014 Ark. 225
| Ark. | 2014Background
- Gordon was convicted in 1995 of capital murder and sentenced to life without parole, a sentence this Court affirmed along with codefendants.
- Gordon later sought postconviction relief under Rule 37, which the circuit court denied.
- In 2013 Gordon filed a habeas petition under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-118(b)(1)(A)–(B), challenging the legality of his sentence as a juvenile under Miller v. Alabama and asserting birth-date errors affecting his age at offense.
- Gordon provided a birth certificate showing birth date August 18, 1977, arguing he was seventeen at the offense, which would make him a juvenile at the time.
- The circuit court granted the writ, vacated Gordon’s life-without-parole sentence, and ordered resentencing, sua sponte relying on Miller and Jackson v. Norris.
- The State appealed, challenging (a) cognizability of Miller claims in habeas and (b) compliance with habeas procedures under §§16-112-101 to -108; this Court remands for a proper probable-cause finding under §16-112-103.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Miller claims are cognizable in habeas corpus | Gordon argues Miller claims are cognizable and remediable in habeas as void/illegal sentences for juveniles. | State contends Miller claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus and would expand habeas remedies improperly. | Gordon's Miller claim is cognizable in habeas corpus. |
| Whether Miller applies retroactively in this context | Gordon relies on Miller as applicable to his juvenile status at offense. | State argues Miller does not apply retroactively to habeas petitions. | The court does not decide retroactivity on the merits here; remands for proper procedural groundwork. |
| Whether the writ complied with the habeas procedure statutes | Gordon asserts writ procedures were satisfied or substantially so; service and notice fulfilled return requirements. | State asserts writ procedures were mandatory and the circuit court failed to issue a proper return/find probable cause per statute. | Writ procedures require a probable-cause determination; remand to determine probable cause is needed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (U.S. 2012) (mandatory LWOP for juveniles unconstitutional)
