History
  • No items yet
midpage
3 Cal. App. 5th 1155
Cal. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Christie and Justin Hjelm leased an apartment from Prometheus Real Estate; within ~15 months the unit had a severe bedbug infestation and there was raw sewage on the property, and the family moved out.
  • The Hjelms sued asserting negligence, premises liability, constructive eviction, breach of implied warranty of habitability, negligent infliction of emotional distress, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, and nuisance; they sought damages and attorney fees.
  • Prometheus defended on factual and procedural grounds and pleaded affirmative defenses including contract-based defenses and statutes of limitation.
  • At summary adjudication the trial court ruled Civil Code § 1717 applied to make one-sided lease fee provisions reciprocal; the case proceeded to an eight‑day jury trial and the jury awarded the Hjelms economic and noneconomic damages.
  • The trial court awarded the Hjelms $326,475 in attorney fees under § 1717; Prometheus appealed the fee award and attempted to attack the underlying verdict as well.
  • The Court of Appeal affirmed the fee award, held the attempt to appeal the underlying verdict was untimely/waived, and remanded for determination of appellate fees to the Hjelms.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness/ability to appeal the jury verdict N/A (Hjelms sought fees; verdict final) Prometheus sought to challenge the underlying verdict on appeal Appeal as to the verdict was untimely; postjudgment fee order did not reopen the final-judgment appeal window; verdict challenge waived
Applicability of Civ. Code § 1717 (one‑sided fee provisions) § 1717 applies because several lease clauses allowed Prometheus to recover fees; the Hjelms prevailed on contract‑based theories (e.g., warranty of habitability, constructive eviction) § 1717 does not apply because Hjelms asserted tort claims and did not bring a contract claim on which fees can be awarded § 1717 applies: the Hjelms’ claims arose from the lease (were "on a contract"); fee clauses must be applied reciprocally when unenforceable one‑sided clauses exist
Election of tort remedies / emotional distress damages bars § 1717 Jury awarded emotional distress but Hjelms also sought and prevailed on contract‑based theories; they did not elect exclusively tort remedies Because plaintiffs recovered distinctive tort remedies (emotional distress), § 1717 should not apply Rejection of defendant’s election argument: presence of tort damages does not preclude § 1717 where causes of action arise from contract and jury found contract‑based theories (constructive eviction, warranty of habitability)
Apportionment and reasonableness of fee award Hjelms: lodestar supported by detailed time records; fees are reasonable and not subject to downward apportionment because claims were intertwined Prometheus: trial court failed to explain award and should have apportioned fees (reducing award proportionally to economic damages) Trial court acted within discretion; lodestar submissions were adequate, apportionment not required where claims are inextricably intertwined; no abuse of discretion shown

Key Cases Cited

  • Trope v. Katz, 11 Cal.4th 274 (Cal. 1995) (one‑sided attorney‑fee clauses are subject to § 1717 reciprocal application)
  • Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal.4th 599 (Cal. 1998) (purpose of § 1717 is to prevent oppressive one‑sided fee provisions)
  • Torres v. City of San Diego, 154 Cal.App.4th 214 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) (postjudgment addition of fees/costs does not extend appeal period to attack the original judgment)
  • Fairchild v. Park, 90 Cal.App.4th 919 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001) (warranty of habitability claims are actions on the contract for § 1717 purposes)
  • Dell Merk, Inc. v. Franzia, 132 Cal.App.4th 443 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) (liberal construction of "on a contract" under § 1717)
  • Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Tilbury Constructors, 208 Cal.App.4th 286 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (attorney fees need not be apportioned when claims are inextricably intertwined)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hjelm v. Promestheus Real Estate Group CA1/2
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 9, 2016
Citations: 3 Cal. App. 5th 1155; 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 394; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 833; A142723
Docket Number: A142723
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Hjelm v. Promestheus Real Estate Group CA1/2, 3 Cal. App. 5th 1155