Hinkson v. State
310 Ga. 388
Ga.2020Background
- In Jan 2012 eight‑month‑old Alexander Cabanayan was severely injured while alone with his father, Shane Hinkson; medical evidence showed abusive head trauma and homicide resulted.
- Jennifer Cabanayan found Alexander distressed and took him to the hospital; Hinkson called her urging her to come "right away," was later found holding a gun, and gave a recorded statement admitting he had "lost it," repeatedly picked the child up and put him down, and was holding a gun when Jennifer arrived.
- Police recovered a handgun in Hinkson’s apartment; Alexander died after emergency brain surgery.
- A grand jury indicted Hinkson on multiple counts including malice murder, felony murder (aggravated assault predicate), aggravated assault, and cruelty to children; he was convicted of involuntary manslaughter (lesser included of malice murder) and felony murder based on aggravated assault and sentenced to life with parole eligibility.
- Hinkson appealed, raising challenges to the verdicts (alleged repugnancy and sufficiency), to the indictment (special/general demurrer), to admission of his custodial statement (probable cause and Miranda waiver), and to admission of evidence of the gun (Fourth Amendment/search).
Issues
| Issue | Hinkson's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verdicts & sufficiency / Turner challenge | Jury returned inconsistent verdicts (involuntary manslaughter + aggravated assault); Turner requires vacatur/remand for repugnant verdicts | Turner inapplicable; evidence sufficient for felony murder; Springer permits multiple guilty verdicts based on different mens rea | Affirmed: sufficiency OK; Turner does not apply; Springer controls — not mutually exclusive |
| Special demurrer to indictment (aggravated assault/felony murder) | Count failed to specify manner of simple assault or how hands caused abusive head injury; lacked attendant facts showing assault inherently dangerous | Indictment alleged aggravating element (hands caused abusive head injury); need not detail manner; defendant had adequate notice; objection to attendant circumstances waived | Denied: indictment sufficient as to aggravated assault; attendant‑circumstances objection waived/moot |
| General demurrer to indictment (substance) | Indictment insufficient to prove element that object was "likely to result" in serious bodily injury or show life‑threatening predicate | Indictment alleged actual resulting serious bodily injury (aggravating element); general‑demurrer argument not timely/preserved | Denied/not reviewed on merits: preservation and timeliness defects; substantive argument fails where aggravating element alleged |
| Motion to suppress custodial statement and gun evidence | Statement was fruit of unlawful arrest (no probable cause) and Miranda waiver invalid; apartment search violated Fourth Amendment so gun evidence inadmissible | Probable cause supported arrest; Miranda warnings given and waiver (implied) valid despite officer comment; gun testimony cumulative and any error harmless beyond reasonable doubt | Denied: probable cause existed; Miranda waiver knowing/intelligent; admission of gun testimony (not the gun) harmless beyond reasonable doubt |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
- Turner v. State, 283 Ga. 17 (repugnant‑verdict analysis)
- State v. Springer, 297 Ga. 376 (multiple guilty verdicts based on different mens rea not mutually exclusive)
- State v. Wyatt, 295 Ga. 257 (aggravated‑assault indictment need not specify the manner of the lesser included simple assault)
- Eberhart v. State, 307 Ga. 254 (predicate felony for felony murder must be inherently dangerous or life‑threatening)
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda warnings requirement)
- Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (an uncoerced statement after Miranda warnings can establish an implied waiver)
- White v. State, 307 Ga. 601 (probable cause for arrest supported by admissions/behavior)
- Ensslin v. State, 308 Ga. 462 (harmless‑beyond‑reasonable‑doubt standard for constitutional errors)
