2020 Ohio 4896
Ohio Ct. App.2020Background
- In 2015 Hillman filed an accusation by affidavit under R.C. 2935.09 alleging Columbus police officer David Larrison committed perjury during Hillman's criminal trial.
- The trial court dismissed; Hillman appealed repeatedly and this Court remanded multiple times for the trial court to follow R.C. 2935.10 and to consider whether Hillman’s accusation was meritorious.
- On the third remand the trial court found Hillman’s affidavit lacked probable cause, referred the matter to the county prosecutor, and closed the case; this Court affirmed that judgment in Hillman IV.
- Hillman contended the trial court had imposed court costs and filing fees and repeatedly sought relief; he filed a motion to vacate fines and costs on October 1, 2019, which the trial court denied on November 19, 2019.
- The county clerk later sent Hillman a bill for $163; Hillman appealed the denial of his motion to vacate fines and costs to this Court on January 3, 2020.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed: it held the trial court’s entry did not impose costs, the clerk of courts is not a party to the action, and the proper remedy to compel the clerk is an action for a writ of mandamus.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court denied substantive due process and equal protection by imposing and refusing to vacate court costs and filing fees tied to Hillman’s R.C. 2935.09 affidavit | Hillman: court imposed unauthorized court costs/filing fees and refused to vacate them, violating due process and equal protection | Larrison/trial court: the trial court’s judgment entry did not impose any costs or fees; any billing by the clerk is not part of this action | Court: Overruled. Trial court did not impose costs; Hillman not aggrieved on that ground; clerk’s billing is outside the case and not properly before this Court. |
| Appropriate procedural remedy to challenge clerk’s billing | Hillman sought vacation of costs in same action | Respondent: clerk is not a party; mandamus is proper vehicle | Court: Directed that mandamus under R.C. Chapter 2731 is the proper means to compel a public official like the clerk. |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle, 6 Ohio St.3d 28 (1983) (sets three requirements for obtaining a writ of mandamus)
