Hillen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-341
| Fed. Cl. | Sep 19, 2017Background
- Petitioner Paul Hillen filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging injury from a Tdap vaccine administered on February 3, 2014.
- The Special Master issued a decision on October 11, 2016 adopting the respondent’s proffer and awarding compensation to petitioner.
- On February 3, 2017, Hillen moved for attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $13,568.80 (fees $13,093.50; costs $475.30), and counsel represented petitioner had no out-of-pocket expenses.
- Respondent filed a response stating no objection to the overall amount requested but reserved the right to contest specific rates, hours, or costs.
- The Special Master found the requested amount reasonable and granted the motion, awarding a lump sum of $13,568.80 payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Are requested attorneys’ fees and costs reasonable under the Vaccine Act? | Hillen sought $13,568.80 as reasonable reimbursement for fees and costs. | Respondent did not object to the total amount, but expressly reserved the right to challenge specific rates/hours/costs. | Award granted in full; total of $13,568.80 awarded as reasonable. |
| Should respondent’s lack of objection be treated as concession on rates/hours? | Implicitly argued overall reasonableness via fee request. | Respondent clarified lack of objection should not be treated as admission on specific billing details. | Lack of objection did not alter outcome; award granted based on reasonableness. |
| Form of payment and scope of award | Requested lump-sum payment to petitioner and counsel. | No objection to form. | Award ordered as a lump sum check jointly payable to petitioner and counsel. |
| Whether attorney may later collect additional fees/costs beyond award | Petitioner sought comprehensive award covering legal services and costs. | Respondent reserved rights but cited no legal basis to collect additional amounts. | The award is intended to cover all legal expenses; attorney may not collect additional fees under precedent. |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (an award under the Vaccine Act encompasses all fees and costs and prevents the attorney from collecting additional fees from the client)
