History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. State
315 Ga. App. 833
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hill was indicted in 2009 on two RICO counts, four subornation of false swearing counts, and one attempt count; motion to dismiss based on pre-indictment delay and speedy trial rights; denial upheld on appeal.
  • Arrest and indictment occurred November 20, 2009; released on bond around November 25, 2009; arraigned February 3, 2010 with extended motions deadline to August 31, 2010; motions filed in April 2010; instant motion filed August 31, 2010.
  • Case calendar showed readiness issues for motions/hearing; numerous leaves of absence and conflicts for Hill, counsel, and State through 2011.
  • Trial court denied Hill’s motion on August 5, 2011; Hill appeals, challenging pre-indictment delay and Sixth Amendment speedy-trial issues.
  • Court held the pre-indictment delay did not create due process violation; Barker-Doggett speedy-trial analysis found presumptive prejudice but no actual prejudice; judgment affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether pre-indictment delay violated due process Hill contends delay was deliberate and prejudicial State argues no due-process violation since no actual prejudice shown No due-process violation
Whether the Sixth Amendment speedy-trial right was violated Hill argues delay was presumptively prejudicial and prejudicial under Barker-Doggett State contends delay weighed neutrally or was not prejudicial Presumptively prejudicial delay but no actual prejudice; no Sixth Amendment violation
Proper application of Barker-Doggett balancing including duration and reasons for delay Delay was long and largely attributable to State actions Delay due to both sides with overcrowded docket; not solely State blame Neutral as to reason; no abuse of discretion in balancing

Key Cases Cited

  • Billingslea v. State, 311 Ga. App. 490 (Ga. App. 2011) (requires actual prejudice and deliberate delay for due process claim)
  • Hill v. State, 312 Ga. App. 12 (Ga. App. 2011) (pre-indictment delay and speedy-trial considerations)
  • Stewart v. State, 310 Ga. App. 551 (Ga. App. 2011) ( Barker-Doggett framework application)
  • Robinson v. State, 287 Ga. 265 (Ga. 2010) (delay attributions between state and defense)
  • Teasley v. State, 307 Ga. App. 153 (Ga. App. 2010) (unexamined reasons for delay weigh against State when docket is crowded)
  • Hayes v. State, 298 Ga. App. 338 (Ga. App. 2009) (delay over 12 months presumptively prejudicial)
  • Johnson v. State, 313 Ga. App. 895 (Ga. App. 2012) (consideration of length of delay in Barker-Doggett analysis)
  • Howard v. State, 307 Ga. App. 822 (Ga. App. 2011) (failure to assert speedy-trial right weighs against defendant)
  • Higgins v. State, 308 Ga. App. 257 (Ga. App. 2011) (need for specific prejudice evidence to support missing-witness claim)
  • Porter v. State, 288 Ga. 524 (Ga. 2011) (defendant’s inability to show prejudice weighs against him)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 10, 2012
Citation: 315 Ga. App. 833
Docket Number: A12A0363
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.