History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Bradley
3:21-cv-01857
| M.D. Penn. | May 16, 2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Sheldon W. Hill is a federal inmate serving a 151‑month sentence (Bank Robbery), with projected release May 9, 2025 via good conduct time.
  • Hill filed a §2241 habeas petition asking the court to order the BOP to apply 915 hours of First Step Act (FSA) earned time credits (ETCs) for completed programming.
  • The BOP has performed seven First Step Act risk assessments since 2019; Hill was assessed as a high recidivism risk in each assessment.
  • Hill has completed at most 83 hours of programming to date; BOP records and policy state accrued credits cannot be applied until an inmate is a minimum or low recidivism risk.
  • The BOP submitted a declaration explaining statutory and regulatory requirements (including 18 U.S.C. §3624(g) and 28 C.F.R. §523.44) and noted Hill did not use the administrative remedy process or file a traverse.
  • The District Court denied the §2241 petition, concluding the statute precludes application of FSA time credits while Hill remains at high risk.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FSA earned time credits may be applied before an inmate is reassessed to low/minimum recidivism risk Hill: BOP should apply 915 hours of ETCs for completed programs now BOP: §3624(g) and implementing rules require a last reassessment (or two for prerelease) showing minimum/low risk before credits are applied Court: Denied — statutory text bars applying credits until risk level is reduced to minimum/low
Whether habeas relief is appropriate given available BOP administrative remedies Hill: seeks judicial relief to obtain application of credits (did not file traverse) BOP: Hill had administrative remedies available and did not exhaust them; factual declaration supports BOP position Court: Denied — primary basis statutory ineligibility; administrative remedy available and not pursued by Hill

Key Cases Cited

  • None (the opinion did not cite any authorities with official reporter citations).
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Bradley
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 16, 2023
Docket Number: 3:21-cv-01857
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Penn.