History
  • No items yet
midpage
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON VS. SANCHEZ (LUIS)
2019 NV 68
| Nev. | 2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Sanchez was charged with two counts of attempted lewdness with a child under 14 under NRS 201.230 and NRS 193.330; the information alleged the conduct occurred on or between May 8, 2006 and January 31, 2013.
  • He pleaded guilty and received two consecutive 5–15 year sentences.
  • Sanchez filed a postconviction habeas petition claiming the Nevada Department of Corrections miscalculated his parole-eligibility date by failing to apply statutory good-time credits to his minimum terms.
  • The district court granted the petition in part, applying the pre-2007 version of NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (per Williams v. State) to award credits.
  • The State appealed, arguing the 2007 amendment to NRS 209.4465 (adding subsection 8, which bars certain sexual and category A/B felons from receiving the credits) should apply because Sanchez’s charged conduct allegedly continued through 2013.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Sanchez) Defendant's Argument (State) Held
Which version of NRS 209.4465 applies when conduct began before but continued after the 2007 amendment? The pre-2007 statute applies because the offense began in 2006 and Sanchez is entitled to credits. If the offense is continuous and ended after the 2007 amendment, the 2007 version (which precludes credits for listed offenses) applies. Court: If the convicted offense is continuous, the 2007 statute governs; if not, the pre-2007 statute governs.
Whether attempted lewdness with a child under 14 is a continuing offense Attempt is not a continuing offense; therefore pre-2007 statute applies and credits are allowed. The charged date range shows a continuing offense; thus the 2007 amendment (no credits) should apply. Court: Attempted lewdness with a child under 14 is not a continuing offense; the district court correctly applied the pre-2007 statute and awarded credits.

Key Cases Cited

  • Williams v. State, 133 Nev. 594, 402 P.3d 1260 (2017) (interpreting NRS 209.4465 good-time credit application to parole eligibility)
  • Rimer v. State, 131 Nev. 307, 351 P.3d 697 (2015) (recognizing child-abuse provisions may be treated as continuing offenses)
  • Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) (standard for treating offenses as continuing)
  • Jackson v. State, 128 Nev. 598, 291 P.3d 1274 (2012) (statutory-construction review standard)
  • Wilson v. State, 121 Nev. 345, 114 P.3d 285 (2005) (permitting allegations by time frame rather than exact date)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON VS. SANCHEZ (LUIS)
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 26, 2019
Citation: 2019 NV 68
Docket Number: 77622
Court Abbreviation: Nev.