Hickman v. State
2011 Miss. LEXIS 535
| Miss. | 2011Background
- Hickman was charged with capital murder with underlying robbery after a mistrial and subsequent retrial.
- At retrial, Walls testified about prior conversations with Hickman, including a purported marijuana-related context, which the State sought to exclude.
- The trial court limited cross-examination on Walls’ marijuana-related testimony under evidentiary rules.
- Other witnesses tied Hickman to Reed’s car, gun, and attempted financial transactions, including surveillance video and at-issue credit card use.
- Hickman confessed to Terrell in jail that he shot Reed, and the jury convicted Hickman of capital murder with robbery as the underlying felony.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confrontation right violated by cross-examination restriction | Hickman argues Walls’ marijuana remark was probative of credibility. | State contends remark was irrelevant and prejudicial. | No error; restriction within trial court discretion. |
| Verdict against the overwhelming weight of the evidence | Evidence, excluding Terrell’s confession, does not support guilt. | Evidence viewed in light favorable to verdict supports guilt. | No reversal; verdict not against the weight of the evidence. |
Key Cases Cited
- Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004) (Confrontation Clause scope in testimonial statements)
- Brent v. State, 632 So.2d 936 (Miss. 1994) (Rule 608(b) cross-examination of conduct and truthfulness)
- Johnston v. State, 567 So.2d 237 (Miss. 1990) (Rule 608(b) prior similar conduct relevance for credibility)
- Havard v. State, 800 So.2d 1193 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001) (Cross-examination admissibility of marijuana use for memory/observation)
- Smith v. State, 733 So.2d 793 (Miss. 1999) (Drug-use history admissible when reflecting credibility or mental state)
- Williams v. State, 32 So.3d 486 (Miss. 2010) (Accomplice testimony sufficiency considerations)
- Blanchard v. State, 55 So.3d 1074 (Miss. 2011) (Weight-of-the-evidence standard; limited physical evidence not determinative)
- Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836 (Miss. 2005) (Weight-of-evidence review standard for new trials)
