History
  • No items yet
midpage
74 F. Supp. 3d 329
D.D.C.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Hickman filed in the D.C. Superior Court alleging the Library of Congress and the Martin Luther King Public Library placed him on no-enter lists for years and sought $1,000,000 in damages.
  • The Librarian of Congress removed the case to this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442(a)(1) and 1446 and moved to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)-(6).
  • The D.C. Public Library separately moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).
  • Plaintiff’s oppositions and a subsequent one-page filing failed to present cogent arguments supporting relief.
  • The court granted the federal defendant’s and the D.C. Public Library’s motions, denied the plaintiff’s two-part motion, and dismissed the case.
  • The court concluded the FTCA does not waive immunity for libel/slander and that exhaustion of administrative remedies is required; the Library is not a suable entity as a subordinate D.C. agency.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FTCA provides a waiver for the claim Hickman argues for relief against the United States FTCA does not cover libel/slander claims and requires exhaustion FTCA does not provide jurisdiction; dismissal granted
Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies is satisfied Hickman did not exhaust remedies Exhaustion required under 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Lack of exhaustion bars jurisdiction; dismissal granted
Whether the Library of Congress is a suable entity under FTCA Not explicitly raised separate from federal claims FTCA requires agency liability and Congress excludes libel/slander FTCA claim cannot proceed; dismissal granted
Whether the D.C. Public Library can be sued in its own name N/A Agency not suable; subordinate to District government Dismissal of DC Public Library claim; not a proper defendant

Key Cases Cited

  • Wilson v. Obama, 770 F. Supp. 2d 188 (D.D.C. 2011) (sovereign immunity and FTCA exhaustion guidance)
  • FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court 1994) (FTCA waiver and scope; sovereign immunity limits claims)
  • Keeffe v. Library of Congress, 777 F.2d 1573 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (Library of Congress broadly within FTCA agency definition)
  • Simpkins v. D.C. Gov’t, 108 F.3d 366 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (unexhausted FTCA claim lacks jurisdiction)
  • Abdurrahman v. Engstrom, 168 F.App’x 445 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (affirming dismissal for unexhausted FTCA claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hickman v. Library of Congress
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Nov 24, 2014
Citations: 74 F. Supp. 3d 329; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164068; 2014 WL 6612905; Civil Action No. 2014-0492
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2014-0492
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
Log In