Hernandez v. Ray Domenico Farms, Inc.
414 P.3d 700
Colo.2018Background
- Plaintiffs are seasonal and year‑round farmworkers who alleged unpaid overtime (FLSA) and AWPA wages during employment and brought Colorado Wage Claim Act claims after termination.
- Several plaintiffs were terminated in April 2016; the suit was filed July 2016 in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado alleging, inter alia, violations of the Colorado Wage Claim Act (§§ 8-4-101 to -123).
- Issue certified to Colorado Supreme Court under C.A.R. 21.1: whether Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-109(1)(a) lets a terminated employee sue for any unpaid wages earned during employment even if § 8-4-122 statute of limitations had already run on those wages when suit is filed.
- Section 8-4-103 requires regular pay during employment; § 8-4-109 requires payment of wages unpaid at termination; § 8-4-122 imposes a 2‑year limitations period (3 years for willful violations).
- District court found plausible competing readings and certified the question; Colorado Supreme Court reviewed de novo and applied plain‑language statutory construction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does § 8-4-109 permit a terminated employee to recover wages unpaid at any time during employment even if those wages became time‑barred under § 8-4-122? | § 8-4-109 revives all unpaid wages at termination; limitations period should run from termination. | § 8-4-109 covers only final paycheck items (wages due at separation); earlier pay claims remain governed by § 8-4-103 and time barred. | § 8-4-109 allows claims for previously earned but unpaid wages, but § 8-4-122’s limitations period applies and accrues when each wage first became due (payday after pay period). Claims limited to 2 years (3 if willful) before termination. |
Key Cases Cited
- Leonard v. McMorris, 63 P.3d 323 (Colo. 2003) (standard: de novo review and give effect to statute’s plain language)
- In re 2000–2001 Dist. Grand Jury, 97 P.3d 921 (Colo. 2004) (apply statute as written when text is clear)
- Morrison v. Goff, 91 P.3d 1050 (Colo. 2004) (statutes of limitation construed to promote justice and avoid stale claims)
