History
  • No items yet
midpage
403 S.W.3d 136
Mo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother and Father share custody dispute over Child (born 2007) after paternity action; initial judgment gave Mother sole physical custody with Father visitation and child support.
  • A 2008 decree awarded joint legal custody and sole physical custody to Mother; Father received visitation and $534/month child support.
  • 2009 modification granted Father additional visitation; thereafter Father moved to modify custody and support.
  • Father alleged Mother limited visitation, violated parenting plan, and preferred private schooling; desired joint physical custody and educational mailing rights.
  • Mother sought increased child support contending increased earnings and education costs; both parties sought attorneys’ fees.
  • Trial court found Mother lied or was not forthcoming, ordered joint physical custody with Father as residential parent for mailing/education, terminated child support, and awarded Father partial attorney’s fees; Mother appeals.
  • Ultimate holding: trial court’s custody modification to joint physical custody with Father as residential parent for mailing/education is affirmed; no child support obligation remains; Mother pays $5,000 toward Father’s fees; judgment affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was a substantial, continuing change of circumstances for custody modification. Mother argues no change. Father argues changes exist. Yes; substantial change supported.
Whether preschool placement change constitutes a change of circumstances justifying modification (mootness). Mother challenges preschool decision. Court’s choice shows change. Point moot; affirmed as moot.
Whether designation of Father as residential parent for mailing and education was proper. Mother contends no causative factors. Record supports change due to Mother's conduct. Proper; evidence supports designation.
Whether modification eliminating Father’s child support was warranted. Mother argues support should continue. Joint custody and changed circumstances warrant 0 support. Warranted; no support assessed.
Whether the award of attorneys’ fees to Father and denial to Mother was proper. Mother argues improper fee award. Mother caused unnecessary litigation; fees justified. Fees properly awarded to Father.

Key Cases Cited

  • Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976) (governs standard of review in custody modification)
  • In re Marriage of Sutton, 233 S.W.3d 786 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) (substantial change of circumstances standard in MO custody cases)
  • K.J.B. v. C.M.B., 779 S.W.2d 86 (Mo. App. E.D. 1989) (prior evidence not precluded under §452.410 when not previously litigated)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hermann v. Heskett
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citations: 403 S.W.3d 136; 2013 WL 3246384; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 796; No. ED 98876
Docket Number: No. ED 98876
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In