History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henley v. State
317 Ga. App. 776
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Henley pleaded guilty to robbery and was placed on probation for 11 years, 11 months, and 11 days.
  • In 2010, during a roadblock stop, Henley failed to produce a license and gave a false name, leading to arrest and a search of the vehicle.
  • Police found unidentified pills and two pipes that appeared to be used for smoking controlled substances.
  • The State sought revocation based on eight violations: two new felony drug possessions, three new misdemeanors, and three technical violations.
  • The trial court revoked four years of Henley’s probation; Henley sought discretionary review, which was granted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of admissible evidence for possession of controlled substances Henley contends the pills were not proven contraband due to lacking foundation and no lab results. Henley argues the trial court impermissibly relied on hearsay and non-testifying officer statements. Evidence insufficient; error to rely on hearsay and lack of identification.
Possession of drug-related objects and equal access Henley asserts no evidence he knew of or possessed the pipes; owner’s presence undermines possession. State relies on exclusive possession presumed from driving the vehicle where objects were found. Equal access rebuttal needed; record fails to show sufficient equal access; presumption not overcome.
Authorized scope of revocation duration under OCGA 42-8-34.1(c) Only the drug-related objects misdemeanor and other admitted offenses were proven; not the two-year limit. State argues broader revocation based on multiple violations. Remand for resentencing within two-year revocation period.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. State, 294 Ga. App. 1 (2008) (two-year revocation context discussed)
  • Mercado v. State, 317 Ga. App. 403 (2012) (equal access and possession considerations)
  • Maldonado v. State, 313 Ga. App. 511 (2012) (sole occupant and access to contents; possession inference)
  • Henry v. State, 311 Ga. App. 353 (2011) (constructive possession presumption in vehicle contraband cases)
  • Navarro v. State, 293 Ga. App. 329 (2008) (equal access analysis and possession principles)
  • Mangum v. State, 308 Ga. App. 84 (2011) (equal access strength depends on evidence)
  • In the Interest of B. C. G., 235 Ga. App. 1 (1998) (indictment description governs over cited statute)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Henley v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 3, 2012
Citation: 317 Ga. App. 776
Docket Number: A12A1542
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.