History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hendricks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-850
Fed. Cl.
Mar 1, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Jennifer Hendricks filed a Vaccine Act claim alleging SIRVA from a flu vaccine administered on October 15, 2014.
  • On May 19, 2016, the special master issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on respondent’s proffer.
  • Petitioner moved for attorneys’ fees and costs on May 27, 2016, requesting $26,263.25 in fees and $579.35 in costs (total $26,842.60).
  • Respondent agreed the statutory requirements for fees were met but argued a reasonable award would be $12,000–$15,000 and suggested some tasks could have been billed at paralegal rates.
  • Petitioner submitted a reply revising hourly rates and sought an additional $2,640 for preparing the reply, reducing her prior adjustments and resulting in a revised requested total of $22,516.85 for fees plus costs, and ultimately asked to recover the original $26,842.60 plus the $2,640 reply fee.
  • The special master reviewed billing records, applied rates consistent with Garrison precedent, awarded the full original requested amount ($26,842.60) plus $2,640 for the reply, and ordered a lump-sum payment of $29,482.60 jointly to petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Entitlement to attorneys’ fees and costs under Vaccine Act Hendricks sought statutory fees/costs as reasonable for work performed Respondent did not contest entitlement but questioned reasonableness/amount Award granted; statutory requirements satisfied
Reasonableness of requested amount Counsel presented billing records and supported requested rates; sought additional $2,640 for reply work Respondent argued requested amount was high based on survey and some work suited for paralegal rates; proposed $12k–$15k range Special master found records reasonable and awarded full requested amount plus $2,640 reply fee
Appropriate hourly rates for counsel Petitioner proposed local/rate adjustments in reply (e.g., $28/hr for 2014–15, $300/hr for 2016) but ultimately accepted rates applied by the court Respondent implied some rate reduction and task reallocation would be appropriate Special master applied rates consistent with Garrison: $387.50/hr (2015) and $409.00/hr (2016) and used them to calculate the award
Payment mechanics and scope of award Petitioner asked fees/costs be paid; counsel represented no out-of-pocket petitioner expenses Respondent noted its limited role and only addressed reasonableness Court awarded lump-sum check jointly payable to petitioner and counsel; award covers all legal expenses and precludes further fee collection

Key Cases Cited

  • Garrison v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 128 Fed. Cl. 99 (2016) (special master applied and affirmed hourly rates for vaccine program counsel)
  • Beck v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (fee award covers all legal expenses and prevents attorney from charging additional fees)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hendricks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Mar 1, 2017
Docket Number: 15-850
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.