History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hellweg v. SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGEMENT
956 N.E.2d 954
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Hellweg sued for negligence arising from a 2009 bicycle race on municipal streets organized by defendants.
  • The course was advertised as a closed course; a nonparticipant minor, Quevedo, collided with Hellweg during a warm-up on the course.
  • Hellweg alleges defendants failed to close the course as promised, contributing to his injuries.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss the negligence claims with prejudice under section 2-619, relying on a Release signed by Hellweg.
  • Hellweg contends the Release is unenforceable because the risk of a nonparticipant on a closed course was not foreseeable.
  • Trial court granted the 2-619 dismissals; Hellweg appeals under Supreme Court Rule 304(a).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Enforceability of the exculpatory release Hellweg says the release is unenforceable because the risk was not foreseeable. Release unambiguously absolves Releasees from claims arising from their own negligence. Release enforceable; dismissals affirmed.
Scope of the release for collisions with nonparticipants Release does not cover a collision with a nonparticipating minor on the course. Release covers collisions on the course, including with pedestrians and other objects. Release broad enough to include plaintiff's collision with Quevedo.
Foreseeability and risk contemplation Foreseeability of the exact act was not contemplated; thus not within the release. Foreseeability is broader; risks ordinarily accompanying the activity are within the release. Foreseeability and broad risk scope support enforceability.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garrison v. Combined Fitness Centre, Ltd., 201 Ill.App.3d 581 (Ill. App. 1990) (exculpatory clause scrutinized against bargaining power and public policy)
  • Falkner v. Hinckley Parachute Center, Inc., 178 Ill.App.3d 597 (Ill. App. 1989) (strict construction against party benefiting from release)
  • Larsen v. Vic Tanny International, 130 Ill.App.3d 574 (Ill. App. 1984) (foreseeability defines scope of exculpatory clause)
  • Schlessman v. Henson, 83 Ill.2d 82 (Ill. 1980) (racing context recognizing broad release scope)
  • Simpson v. Byron Dragway, Inc., 210 Ill.App.3d 639 (Ill. App. 1991) (whether injury is within risks traditionally associated with activity)
  • Van Meter v. Darien Park District, 207 Ill.2d 359 (Ill. 2003) (purpose and standard for 2-619 motions)
  • Saichek v. Lupa, 204 Ill.2d 127 (Ill. 2003) (precedent on releases and comparative analysis)
  • Porter v. Decatur Memorial Hospital, 227 Ill.2d 343 (Ill. 2008) (public policy and release review framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hellweg v. SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGEMENT
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jul 8, 2011
Citation: 956 N.E.2d 954
Docket Number: 1-10-3604
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.