History
  • No items yet
midpage
118 So. 3d 885
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Union represents officers of City police department; CBA covered Oct 1, 2007–Sept 30, 2010.
  • Negotiations for a successor agreement began spring 2010; Union refused wage/pension modifications.
  • City declared financial urgency on July 28, 2010 and invoked section 447.4095 to implement changes.
  • Union did not request bargaining over impact of the urgency; impasse resolution process not pursued for urgency.
  • City announced unilateral CBA changes on Aug 31, 2010 addressing wages and retirement benefits; several changes implemented Sept 30–Oct 1, 2010.
  • Union filed ULP with PERC Sept 21, 2010; hearing held with evidence of City’s dire finances and high labor costs.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether City properly invoked 447.4095. Headley asserts misapplication of financial urgency statute. Headley contends City acted with financial urgency justifying modification. Yes; City properly invoked 447.4095.
Whether impact bargaining allowed unilateral CBA changes without impasse process. Union argues impasse process under 447.403 required before modification. City contends 447.4095 permits impact bargaining and immediate implementation after 14 days. Yes; impact bargaining allowed unilateral changes without completing impasse.

Key Cases Cited

  • Chiles v. United Faculty of Florida, 615 So.2d 671 (Fla. 1993) (compelling state interest and no other reasonable alternatives required)
  • Manatee Educ. Ass’n v. Sch. Bd. of Manatee Cnty., 62 So.3d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (financial urgency standards; review of urgency; defers to PERC)
  • City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, 98 So.3d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (affirming ability to declare financial urgency; injunctive context)
  • Dep’t of Admin. v. Pub. Empls. Relations Comm’n, 443 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (need for narrow construction of statutes impacting collective bargaining)
  • Commc’ns Workers of Am. v. Indian River Cnty. Sch. Bd., 888 So.2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (impact of financial urgency on solvency and essential services)
  • United Faculty of Fla. v. Pub. Emps. Relations Comm’n, 898 So.2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (PERC deference in interpreting chapter 447)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Headley v. City of Miami
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 19, 2013
Citations: 118 So. 3d 885; 2013 WL 3770839; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11461; 196 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2439; No. 1D12-2116
Docket Number: No. 1D12-2116
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In