History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hayes v. State
298 Ga. 98
| Ga. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Victim Joshua Grier, who owed money to Samuel Hayes, was found shot dead at Lake Michelle on Jan. 22, 2012; his GPS ankle monitor stopped moving at 9:22 a.m.
  • Phone, video, and tower data placed Hayes traveling with and then following Grier the morning of the killing; surveillance showed two vehicles traveling in tandem and Grier’s car was later burned.
  • Witnesses saw Hayes and Jahan Mims with a handgun the night before; Mims drove and communicated with Hayes the morning of the killing; Hayes made statements afterward suggesting someone was dead.
  • Hayes was indicted and convicted of malice murder, armed robbery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during a felony; sentenced to life without parole plus additional terms.
  • Hayes appealed claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel for (1) failing to object to a conspiracy charge, (2) failing to object to admission of phone/tower records lacking a custodian, (3) failing to object to GPS printout foundation, and (4) failing to move to suppress search-warrant-derived evidence.

Issues

Issue Hayes's Argument State's Argument Held
Jury instruction on conspiracy Counsel should have objected to giving a conspiracy charge when Hayes was not indicted for conspiracy Evidence supported a conspiracy instruction (common design with Mims); no basis to object No ineffective assistance; charge was warranted and counsel reasonably declined to object
Admission of cell phone/tower records without custodian testimony Records were inadmissible because certification was not notarized or sworn under penalty of perjury Georgia Evidence Code does not require notarization or §1746-style penalty-of-perjury signature for domestic records certification No ineffective assistance; Georgia statutes differ from federal rules and certification was sufficient under OCGA §24-8-803(6) and §24-9-902(11)
GPS ankle-monitor printout foundation Counsel should have objected because no GPS company custodian testified to lay foundation under business-record exception Parole supervisor who used the software could qualify as a "custodian or other qualified witness"; counsel reasonably chose not to object as tactical trial strategy No ineffective assistance; strategic withholding of objection reasonable and Hayes failed to show prejudice
Failure to move to suppress search-warrant-based evidence Counsel should have moved to suppress because warrant allegedly lacked oath/affirmation and was issued after the search Record did not show the warrant was invalid; Hayes failed to place warrant in record to prove defect No ineffective assistance; Hayes did not show the evidence would have been suppressed

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (establishes standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Smith v. Francis, 253 Ga. 782 (Georgia application of Strickland)
  • Belsar v. State, 276 Ga. 261 (conspiracy instruction may be given even if defendant not indicted for conspiracy)
  • Crawford v. State, 294 Ga. 898 (agreement/common design supports conspiracy charge)
  • Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (appellate standard: accept trial court fact findings; review law de novo)
  • Martin v. State, 281 Ga. 778 (ineffective assistance claim re: jury instruction)
  • Parker v. State, 296 Ga. 586 (Georgia Evidence Code differences from Federal Rules)
  • Perera v. State, 295 Ga. 880 (business-records and certification principles)
  • Wallace v. State, 296 Ga. 388 (strategy to refrain from objection can be reasonable trial tactic)
  • Biggs v. State, 281 Ga. 627 (need strong showing that suppressed evidence would have been excluded to prevail on failure-to-suppress ineffective-assistance claim)
  • State v. Frost, 297 Ga. 296 (courts may look to federal precedent but must honor substantive differences in Georgia Evidence Code)
  • Fair v. State, 284 Ga. 165 (legislative omission of a requirement evidences intent not to impose it)
  • Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (merger principles for sentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hayes v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 16, 2015
Citation: 298 Ga. 98
Docket Number: S15A0764
Court Abbreviation: Ga.