History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hart v. Groves
311 Ga. App. 587
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Groves was injured in an automobile accident and retained Hart to represent her in a personal injury claim.
  • The liability settlement with the other driver was $25,000, while Groves had potential underinsured motorist (UM) coverage up to $275,000.
  • Hart failed to require a limited release to preserve Groves's UM claim and instead advised a general release and dismissal of the suit.
  • Hart admitted negligence for extinguishing Groves's potential UM benefits claim.
  • Groves presented evidence of medical expenses >$25,000 and claimed damages for lost UM benefits; Hart contested causation and recovery.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Evidence of disability-offset amount Groves argues the offset reduced UM recovery. Hart contends admissibility; seeks to admit disability-offset evidence. Court found no ruling on admissibility; waiver applies.
Admission of Groves email containing hearsay Groves argues email explains Hart's conduct and is admissible for nonhearsay purpose. Hart contends email contains hearsay. Court admitted email for conduct explanation; harmless error as cumulative.

Key Cases Cited

  • Williams v. Resurgens, etc., Orthopaedists, 267 Ga.App. 578 (2004) (no ruling on admissibility; waiver when no ruling)
  • Buttles v. State, 229 Ga.App. 300 (1997) (hearsay exception for nonhearsay use; admissibility reviewed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Hart v. Groves
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 6, 2011
Citation: 311 Ga. App. 587
Docket Number: A11A0989
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.