Harris v. State
S21A0953
Ga.Oct 5, 2021Background:
- On July 1, 2008, after a dispute over an illegally run cable line at a Fulton County duplex, shots were fired at a porch; Marcus Simpson was killed and Kingston Ridley and Kenneth Williams were wounded.
- Antonio Harris (Appellant), his cousin Geno West, and Rontryuas Harris were indicted in 2010 for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assaults, and firearm-possession offenses; they were tried jointly in September 2011.
- The jury acquitted Harris of malice murder but convicted him of felony murder, multiple counts of aggravated assault, and firearm-possession offenses; he received life plus consecutive terms totaling 50 years for the assault convictions.
- Key evidence: testimony from Ridley and Williams that Harris and West shot at the group; recovered 9mm and .380 shell casings at the scene; Harris testified he hid, did not know who fired, and later gave a false name at arrest.
- Harris moved for directed verdict at trial and later raised an ineffective-assistance claim (counsel failed to investigate ballistics); the trial court denied a new trial in 2020, and the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the convictions on October 5, 2021.
Issues:
| Issue | Harris' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence / denial of directed verdict | Evidence was legally insufficient to convict; directed verdict should have been granted | Victim testimony and forensic evidence support conviction; party liability applies so proof that Harris personally fired fatal shot not required | Denied — evidence sufficient; jury could find Harris a party to the crime; personal firing need not be proved |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to investigate ballistics) | Trial counsel was deficient for not investigating whether the fatal shots came from Harris's gun | Even if investigation were deficient, Harris failed to proffer what it would have shown or to show prejudice; convictions can rest on party liability | Denied — no prejudice shown and no proffer of helpful investigative results; claim fails |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (establishes the constitutional standard for sufficiency of the evidence)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (sets the two-prong standard for ineffective-assistance claims)
- Garrett v. State, 288 Ga. 269 (party liability when co-actor fires fatal shot)
- Moore v. State, 311 Ga. 506 (no requirement that the State prove which defendant fired the fatal shot)
- Long v. State, 309 Ga. 721 (to show prejudice from a failure-to-investigate claim, defendant must proffer what additional investigation would have uncovered)
- Charleston v. State, 292 Ga. 678 (participation in a crime may be inferred from association before, during, and after the crime)
- Smith v. State, 304 Ga. 752 (review standard for directed verdict/sufficiency issues)
