midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
194 Ohio App. 3d 120
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Board of Building Appeals upheld a citation for 4509-4515 Main Ave (former Carlisle’s) against Pittsburgh Mellon; Harris appeals the final order.
  • Harris filed a notice of appeal with the trial court on October 6, 2009; Pristera moved to dismiss for lack of a real party in interest.
  • Harris claimed he was the alter ego/owner via a Cuyahoga County divorce court finding awarding ownership.
  • Trial court dismissed the appeal on November 25, 2009 for lack of standing; Harris later sought relief from judgment and a stay, which were denied in 2010.
  • Court held Harris lacked standing and was not the real party in interest or a responsible party under R.C. 3737.43; res judicata/collateral estoppel did not bar the current action; judgment affirmed.
  • Judgment entries dismissing the appeal based on standing were affirmed with costs assessed against Harris.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Harris has standing to pursue the administrative appeal. Harris claims ownership per divorce finding and seeks standing. Pristera contends Harris is not the real party in interest or responsible party. Harris lacked standing; not the real party in interest; appeal properly dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Akron, 109 Ohio St.3d 106 (2006-Ohio-954) (standing and appellate review standards in administrative appeals)
  • Sohi v. Ohio State Dental Bd., 130 Ohio App.3d 414 (1998) (appellate review limited to support in evidence)
  • Willoughby Hills v. C.C. Bar’s Sahara, Inc., 64 Ohio St.3d 24 (1992) (standing required a present interest prejudicing the party)
  • Shealy v. Campbell, 20 Ohio St.3d 23 (1985) (real party in interest definition)
  • Goodson v. McDonough Power Equip., Inc., 2 Ohio St.3d 193 (1983) (collateral estoppel/privity considerations)
  • Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Akron, 109 Ohio St.3d 106 (2006-Ohio-954) (standing and procedural requirements in agency appeals)
  • Thompson v. Wing, 70 Ohio St.3d 176 (1994) (collateral estoppel prerequisites)
  • Hills & Dales v. Ohio Dept. of Edn., 10th Dist. No. 06AP-1249 (2007-Ohio-5156) (administrative appeal party must be adversely affected)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Pristera
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 29, 2011
Citations: 194 Ohio App. 3d 120; 954 N.E.2d 1272; No. 2009-A-0059
Docket Number: No. 2009-A-0059
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In